quacktastic
#1
Posted 2008-February-09, 21:54
Qxx
AQ10
Jxxx
Qxx
(1s)-p-(1n)-2h
(p)-?
You're playing that 2♠ is a limit raise, 2NT is natural/invitational, and 3♦ shows a good raise to 3♥. I think those are the only options here.
#2
Posted 2008-February-09, 22:14
3♦ or 2♠. Does one of these bids show 3 card support only? If so, that is the one I choose.
#3
Posted 2008-February-09, 22:18
#4
Posted 2008-February-09, 22:30
hmm what does 3d show? something just barely under a limit raise?
#5
Posted 2008-February-09, 23:48
mike777, on Feb 9 2008, 11:30 PM, said:
hmm what does 3d show? something just barely under a limit raise?
yes, a hand that would normally raise to 3h but is really close to a LR
#6
Posted 2008-February-10, 00:04
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2008-February-10, 00:09
But given OP says the only options we have are 2S, 2NT and 3D, then I will opt for 3D.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#8
Posted 2008-February-10, 00:15
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2008-February-10, 01:29
rogerclee, on Feb 10 2008, 11:18 AM, said:
2S for me.
If pd has a reasonable hand she will bid 4 anyway or make a try. Wtp?
#11
Posted 2008-February-10, 01:44
encourage partner, but dont want to get him nuts.
Given that he was in a prebal. situation, 2H needs to be
based on full values, a good weak two type hand will be
enough.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2008-February-10, 02:46
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#13
Posted 2008-February-10, 03:33
Apollo81, on Feb 10 2008, 03:54 AM, said:
You forgot pass.
Anyway, I'll bid a simple 3♥ if opps are the sort of pair who opens on 10 hcp and responds on 3. Opposite solid bidders I'll just pass.
#14
Posted 2008-February-10, 12:05
He will clearly accept a limit raise, but should he bid game after the 3♦ bid?
#15
Posted 2008-February-10, 14:18
Apollo81, on Feb 10 2008, 01:05 PM, said:
He will clearly accept a limit raise, but should he bid game after the 3♦ bid?
I wouldn't.
#16
Posted 2008-February-10, 14:38
This is based on my assumption that 2♥ is not a prebalance on this non-fit sequence. If we do prebalance in this sequence, put me down for 3♦.
#17
Posted 2008-February-10, 15:27
rogerclee, on Feb 11 2008, 09:18 AM, said:
Apollo81, on Feb 10 2008, 01:05 PM, said:
He will clearly accept a limit raise, but should he bid game after the 3♦ bid?
I wouldn't.
Me neither.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#18
Posted 2008-February-10, 16:38
mikestar, on Feb 10 2008, 03:38 PM, said:
I guarantee he would have bid 3NT over 2NT.
#19
Posted 2008-February-10, 19:57
Apollo81, on Feb 10 2008, 01:05 PM, said:
He will clearly accept a limit raise, but should he bid game after the 3♦ bid?
I am not a fan of these methods.
Partner has made a 2 level overcall, and can be expected to have a decent hand.
We are playing IMPS, and don't need to conduct delicate auctions looking for a reason to stay out of game. I would rather use one of the bids (the cue or the transfer) to show an invitation with 4 card support, rather than have one bid show a slightly better raise than the other.
For hands on the margins, whether game makes or not depends on how the hands fit, exactly which cards are held, and subtle differences in raises do not help the overcaller judge.
#20
Posted 2008-February-11, 05:10

Help
