What's the difference?
#1
Posted 2008-April-15, 08:48
So you open 1♠, next player bids 2♦, partner says 3♣, RHO says 3♦, passed around to partner, who has a couple of choices. What would these auctions end up meaning?
A.
1♠ 2♦ 3♣ 3♦
-P- -P- 3♠ -P-
B.
1♠ 2♦ 3♣ 3♦
-P- -P- -X- -P-
3♥ -P- 3♠ -P-
Assume the 3♥ call just shows a minimum with 5 spades.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Posted 2008-April-15, 09:08
B isnt forcing in MP & probably not forcing in imps. The opener denied extras by passing 3D, he denied a stopper, he wasnt able to pass 3Dx. Responder doenst have a full fit. So wanting to play 3S is a real possibility.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#3
Posted 2008-April-16, 09:23
A has a higher likelihood of being real support than B, although neither is very likely to be so
#4
Posted 2008-April-16, 11:53
I'm curious about the meaning of the second auction, x = penalty, 3H = i have extra shape but i didn't bid it earlier, or i'm chicken?
#5
Posted 2008-April-16, 12:40
goobers, on Apr 16 2008, 09:53 AM, said:
If we added the option:
"There is insufficient data to tell."
then we could add this as a question on the next GMAT.
Edit: See here http://www.admissionsconsultants.com/gmat/...sufficiency.asp
#6
Posted 2008-April-16, 14:37
goobers, on Apr 16 2008, 10:53 AM, said:
Ditto.
#7
Posted 2008-April-17, 11:58
Apollo81, on Apr 16 2008, 05:23 PM, said:
Agree.
Harald
#8
Posted 2008-April-17, 13:51
skaeran, on Apr 17 2008, 12:58 PM, said:
Apollo81, on Apr 16 2008, 05:23 PM, said:
Agree.
I'm not used to that bid being GF, in particular I'm used to
1♠ 2♦ 3♣ P
3♠ -P-
being not forcing. I have no idea if NF there is SAYC or not.
#9
Posted 2008-April-17, 14:59
With a stranger, I would say A is forcing but B isn't.