Page 1 of 1
another opening problem
#1
Posted 2008-November-25, 03:40
x
void
AKJT8
QT97653
All vulnerable IMP's 1st seat. You can open 2NT for the minors, 5-9, if you want.
void
AKJT8
QT97653
All vulnerable IMP's 1st seat. You can open 2NT for the minors, 5-9, if you want.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2008-November-25, 06:38
Do we have Minorwood or Voidwood in our agreements?
Yes => 2NT followed by Minorwood/Voidwood seems like a good plan.
No => 1♣ followed by cheapest of:
- a ♦ bid up to 4♦ -
- 4NT pick a minor
- 5♣ if everything else is not possible
Yes => 2NT followed by Minorwood/Voidwood seems like a good plan.
No => 1♣ followed by cheapest of:
- a ♦ bid up to 4♦ -
- 4NT pick a minor
- 5♣ if everything else is not possible
#5
Posted 2008-November-25, 06:39
bill1157, on Nov 25 2008, 06:02 AM, said:
1♣followed by a minimum rebid in ♦ if below the 5 level
Bill
Bill
Yes, ... else 5C.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2008-November-25, 06:57
I am not as confident as the others that bidding 1 Club / n diamonds will solve my problems. Opening 1 ♣ and rebidding diamonds sounds like a strong two suiter. My hand is only strong if we have a fit in a minor, else it is a horror.
So I go with 2 NT and will bid 4 Club if possible.
I had tried a 4 NT opening if this had shown both minors- but this is asking for specific aces for me.
So I go with 2 NT and will bid 4 Club if possible.
I had tried a 4 NT opening if this had shown both minors- but this is asking for specific aces for me.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2008-November-25, 06:59
4NT is indeed not available unfortunately
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2008-November-25, 09:39
I am not confident that showing my hand to my partner would solve my problem on this hand.
Failing that, I open 1♣ with the intention of rebidding diamonds. If the opponents force the auction to the 4 level before I get to mention diamonds, I will bid 4NT.
This hand is good, not great, until I get support from partner. With voluntary support of either minor my hand becomes very powerful.
Failing that, I open 1♣ with the intention of rebidding diamonds. If the opponents force the auction to the 4 level before I get to mention diamonds, I will bid 4NT.
This hand is good, not great, until I get support from partner. With voluntary support of either minor my hand becomes very powerful.
#9
Posted 2008-November-26, 09:51
5♦ probably makes, 5♣ is doubled and goes down twice. Other table is in 4♣-1, opps will not bid too much since the hand is a relative misfit. Partner has something like AJxxx KJxx 9xxx
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2008-November-26, 11:06
1♣. I play the 2N gadget - but this hand is way too strong for that - marginally in high cards, but a lot in terms of extra ♣cards.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
#12
Posted 2008-November-26, 11:27
whereagles, on Nov 26 2008, 05:18 PM, said:
Open 2NT and rebid 5♣ on your own later.
That is a possibility I suppose
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
Page 1 of 1

Help
