Your call?
#1
Posted 2010-March-31, 08:49
West holds: Axxx, xx, Axx, KQxx
South....West....North....East
1♣....pass....3♣....3♠
pass....4♠....5♣....pass
pass....?
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#2
Posted 2010-March-31, 09:26
The vulnerability is of course relevant except that this time it isn't imo. On most hands where 5S is right partner would already have bid it.
#4
Posted 2010-March-31, 09:59
Awaiting dburn and picts replies to tell us this isn't a double!
#5
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:02
♣KQ wasted on offense (partner is probably void, and certainly no more than stiff) and no shortness here to suggest playing 5♠.
-gwnn
#6
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:03
#7
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:07
#8
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:15
aguahombre, on Mar 31 2010, 11:07 AM, said:
heh, it does smell like another forum trap.
Besides, is partner absolutely obligated to pass my double? Couldn't he pull to 5♠ with an extreme hand?
-gwnn
#9
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:17
We can infer quite a bit.....partner probably has 4 hearts (no heart bid by either opp) and a void club. So...he will probably be 6430 or 7420...with the latter, we'd need to know his tendencies re an immediate 4♠ call.
Given this, we will usually have play for 5♠. As little as Kxxxxx xxxx Kxx void makes if they lead clubs or the club ruffing hook works, and spades are 2-1.
Red v white, I think I'd take the push....but otherwise I'd take the sure plus (well...almost sure )
#10
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:34
It's amusing to be criticised for getting the last one right.
I don't see an argument for bidding 5♠ unilaterally. Partner knows whether he was pushing them or not, I don't.
For all I know pass is the only way to score, but with good trumps and that useful non-spade Ace, I'll live with the small risk.
As an aside, I like it when dburn or similar players explain their choices. Some posts can be so laconic the poster might as well have voted in the poll and left it at that.
#11
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:36
#12
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:39
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 11:36 AM, said:
Are you assuming 3♣ means something specific?
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#13
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:43
Phil, on Mar 31 2010, 11:39 AM, said:
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 11:36 AM, said:
Are you assuming 3♣ means something specific?
Preemptive with club support??
#14
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:44
#15
Posted 2010-March-31, 10:55
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 11:43 AM, said:
Phil, on Mar 31 2010, 11:39 AM, said:
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 11:36 AM, said:
Are you assuming 3♣ means something specific?
Preemptive with club support??
Well, this is the crux of the problem.
If I told you 3♣ was limit, are you still cracking?
(I see Jlall has already answered this).
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#16
Posted 2010-March-31, 11:05
#17
Posted 2010-March-31, 11:50
Pict, on Mar 31 2010, 06:34 PM, said:
Getting it right???
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#18
Posted 2010-March-31, 11:55
OleBerg, on Mar 31 2010, 12:50 PM, said:
Pict, on Mar 31 2010, 06:34 PM, said:
Getting it right???
You believe in a higher bridge reality where scoring less well is optimal?
#19
Posted 2010-March-31, 12:02
Pict, on Mar 31 2010, 11:55 AM, said:
OleBerg, on Mar 31 2010, 12:50 PM, said:
Pict, on Mar 31 2010, 06:34 PM, said:
Getting it right???
You believe in a higher bridge reality where scoring less well is optimal?
In poker, some players "win" all arguments by saying, "Look at my chip stack."
#20
Posted 2010-March-31, 12:07
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."