Playing 2/1 game forcing, including 1D-Pass-2C,
1♦ - 2♣
3NT
What type of hand would bid 3NT at this point? Would a balanced 18-19 HCP hand bid 3NT or would it bid 2NT and plan on bidding 4NT quantitative over a 3NT bid by responder?
Note that this is a bit different than 1M-2m-2NT/3NT, especially if you are one to not always open 1NT (15-17) with a 5-card major.
Page 1 of 1
1D - 2C - 3NT
#2
Posted 2010-September-04, 03:41
For us, the 2NT rebid is pattern-specific; so 2NT, then 4NT with the 18-19. The pattern is exactly 4-4-3-2, in that order.
With 3-3-5-2, first priority is to rebid diamonds with weak NT strength, but with 18-19 the 3NT rebid gets both the size and the exact shape described.
Of course, none of the above will work if opener cannot raise clubs with 3 of them; so it won't be mainstream.
With 3-3-5-2, first priority is to rebid diamonds with weak NT strength, but with 18-19 the 3NT rebid gets both the size and the exact shape described.
Of course, none of the above will work if opener cannot raise clubs with 3 of them; so it won't be mainstream.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#3
Posted 2010-September-06, 03:03
For me 3NT rebid is exactly 4-4-3-2 with 18-19HCP.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#4
Posted 2010-September-06, 07:41
If you make a move toward slam, you'll find that partner has some random 12-14 balanced nonsense, "Haven't you head of Fast Arrival, p?" Probably the majority of players who purport to play 2/1 game force bid this way.
As to what it ought to be, I'd vote for 18-19 3343. (Most jumps to 3NT before partner has described his hand should be 4333's, definitely not 4432's.)
Do Rodwell and Grant cover this sequence in their 2/1 book?
As to what it ought to be, I'd vote for 18-19 3343. (Most jumps to 3NT before partner has described his hand should be 4333's, definitely not 4432's.)
Do Rodwell and Grant cover this sequence in their 2/1 book?
Paul Hightower
#5
Posted 2010-September-06, 08:05
We play that
1♦ - 2♣
3NT
shows 15-17 with 4441 exactly.
This hand is difficult to show otherwise.
1♦ - 2♣
3NT
shows 15-17 with 4441 exactly.
This hand is difficult to show otherwise.
#6
Posted 2010-September-06, 08:06
lexlogan, on Sep 6 2010, 07:41 AM, said:
If you make a move toward slam, you'll find that partner has some random 12-14 balanced nonsense, "Haven't you head of Fast Arrival, p?" Probably the majority of players who purport to play 2/1 game force bid this way.
As mentioned before, "fast arrival" pertains to when a suit fit has been established in an already game-forcing auction; a jump to game shows weakness for the previous bidding.
Jumps in NT before a fit is established are not treated as "fast arrival" minimum bids by most players. They show extra values.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#7
Posted 2010-September-06, 09:02
NT "picture bids" after a 2/1 GF:
1x 2y 2N = 12-14 or 18-19 (18-19 will bid above 3N)
1x 2y 3N = 15-17 ( edit: and some "flaw" not to open 1NT initially )
1x 2y 2N = 12-14 or 18-19 (18-19 will bid above 3N)
1x 2y 3N = 15-17 ( edit: and some "flaw" not to open 1NT initially )
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
#8
Posted 2010-September-06, 09:23
Whatever 3NT is, it needs to be very specific and narrow range hand because it takes up so much room.
Some play that it shows solid six-card diamonds but not extras otherwise.
Some play it shows NT hands, ranges compatible with the rest of the system.
Some play that it shows solid six-card diamonds but not extras otherwise.
Some play it shows NT hands, ranges compatible with the rest of the system.
Page 1 of 1

Help
