some unusual situations
#1
Posted 2010-September-24, 04:49
r/r mp, you deal.
p-2♦*-3♠-4♥-?
2♦ was multi, weak in one major or some strong options. Your discussion of your multi defense consisted of about 30 seconds of explanation from partner: "2h takeout of spades, 2s takeout of hearts, double 13-15 bal or some strong hand".
2. ♠Qxx ♥Qxx ♦Qxx ♣AKxx
w/r mp, you deal.
1♣-p-2♦-2♥
3♦-p-5♦-5♥
p-p-x-p
1♣ was 2+, unbalanced diamond style with 15-17NT. 2♦ was a weak jump shift.
Perhaps you don't bid 3♦, but it seems to have worked quite well. If you sit for the double, what do you lead?
#2
Posted 2010-September-24, 04:56
2. Of course I pass and lead the club king.
#3
Posted 2010-September-24, 05:38
2. I sit very happily and lead a high club. I would ask for the count in clubs with the King.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2010-September-24, 06:31
hanp, on Sep 24 2010, 05:56 AM, said:
Well, partner didn't have a natural 2S available (why did I agree to this in a 30 second discussion?). That seems a fairly big difference to me.
(It's also not so usual for me to have 6-card support for partner's strongly bid suit. But then I don't play many hands these days.)
I still agree with 5S, though.
#5
Posted 2010-September-24, 08:31
3S to me is a strong jump overcall ish, 6 spades, maybe 18 points. 4S is enough.
Hand 2: Top club
#6
Posted 2010-September-24, 09:22
#7
Posted 2010-September-24, 09:46
#8
Posted 2010-September-24, 09:58
4♠ is correct I think.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2010-September-24, 10:22
So I would be even more happy now, because now I have a clear cut 4 Spade bid.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2010-September-24, 10:26
#11
Posted 2010-September-25, 09:12
2. I was partner. I was hoping double would be read as lightner (I think this is pretty normal meaning for double by preemptor, and it's unclear what else partner can double on here), but it sounds like I don't have much support. The opponents had 10 spades and the first club was ruffed, so we were -850.
#12
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:19
#13
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:46
karlson, on Sep 24 2010, 05:49 AM, said:
- r/r mp, you deal. ♠ Q9xxxx ♥ Qxx ♦ x ♣ Qxx
p-2♦*-3♠-4♥-?
2♦ was multi, weak in one major or some strong options. Your discussion of your multi defense consisted of about 30 seconds of explanation from partner: "2h takeout of spades, 2s takeout of hearts, double 13-15 bal or some strong hand". - w/r mp, you deal. ♠ Qxx ♥ Qxx ♦ Qxx ♣ AKxx
1♣-p-2♦-2♥
3♦-p-5♦-5♥
p-p-x-p
1♣ was 2+, unbalanced diamond style with 15-17NT. 2♦ was a weak jump shift. Perhaps you don't bid 3♦, but it seems to have worked quite well. If you sit for the double, what do you lead?
- 4♠ = 10, 6♠ = 7, 5♠ = 6, 4N = 5, 5♦ = 1.
- 3♦ = 10. Pass of 5♥X = 10. ♣K =10.

Help
