Hi Michael
You and Adam (and probably also Nigel) hit the head of the nail: caching
♦ is at least almost unlikely to be wrong.
However, in the heat of (MP-)play, my analysis stopped at the excitement of endplaying a RHO holding a 5-4-4-0 distribution for the 9th trick.
So after the first 6 tricks (
♠Q-2-3-8;
♠7-5-J-A;
♣4-3-Q-
♠4,
♦2-3-Q-K;
♥6-K-2-
♣7; and
♦9-T-A-5, I erroneously played
♠9 and hoped for something like the following distribution (where the position of
♥Q is irrelevant):
Actually LHO pitched
♦6 when I played the third
♠, and after RHO had catched his 2
♠ tricks, I had to settle for 9 tricks, where at least 10 would have resulted from just continuing
♦, which were distributed 3-3.
What would have been even more emberassing was that if LHO had held
♦8 (iso
♦6) and pitched
♥4 and
♣5 on his partners two
♠ tricks (thereby keeping -/9/8/J96), I would have finessed
♦, when RHO continued with
♦6! - 1 down!!
PS: Michael, I am impressed with your logic conclusion that RHO early
♠ discard shows that he does not hold Qxxx (or Qxxxx) in
♥. It is a wonderful simple argument, but I missed it - of course it would be easy for him to discard 1 (respectively 2)
♥ with one of those holdings, rather than dropping a potential
♠-trick. Actually RHO had KJ643/98742/T83/-.
So only if RHO made an exotic/unlikely
♠-discard from a holding of KJ643/9872/T863/- or KJ643/Q982/T863/-, we will end up having to guess whether to endplay LHO or RHO, respectively. Apparently, you would go for the first, and Nigel for the second endplay. Still, both of these situations are unlikely with the early
♠-discard.
Best regards Niels
Regional Matchplay Championships
Lead ♠Q-2-3-8; ♠7-5-J-A; ♣4-3-Q-♠4!
What now?
If you continue ♦2-3-Q-K; then LHO returns with ♥6.
If you then play ♥6-K-2-♣7; and continue ♦, it goes ♦9-T-A-5.
What now?
Your opponents are national open team level!
Does that influence your plan?
Kind regards from Niels, who - obviously! - chose the wrong continuation.