BBO Discussion Forums: 3 Hearts asking or telling? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 Hearts asking or telling? ACBL

Poll: 3 Hearts asking or telling? (35 member(s) have cast votes)

3 Hearts asking or telling?

  1. I have Hearts (33 votes [94.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 94.29%

  2. Do you have Hearts stopped for 3NT (1 votes [2.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.86%

  3. Other (1 votes [2.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.86%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2011-April-03, 05:02

Quote

My Meta-rule: if a bid can be natural, it is. This interpretation is part of BWS2001.

But again, it is the kind of bid that you should have discussed with partner, and without agreement, it is natural.


Partner won't have four hearts, or he would have responded 2 not 3.

Anyway, I have an agreement suggestion that covers all possible situations:

If there are two suits to be worried about, we SHOW.
If there are three suits we are worried about, we ASK.

This is because, if there are three suits and we show, partner doesn't know which one of the other suits he needs to have to bid 3NT. So asking is best.
I Transfers
0

#22 User is offline   Yu18772 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 466
  • Joined: 2010-August-31
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 2011-April-03, 21:22

View Postdickiegera, on 2011-March-25, 13:26, said:

Auction goes with no interference

1-2-3-3

Is 3 asking partner to bid NT if he has stopped
or is it telling partner that he has Hearts stopped [with possibly 4 in the suit?]
and for you to bid /consider 3NT?




I play simple - if we are below 3NT we are looking for the right game....3rd suit shows 4th denies. So 3 means I have hearts, but no intention to play NT if p doesn't have a good stopper.
This doesn't mean that I won't bid after his response looking for slam, but I want to know more about his holding. ( I also play that 1-2-3-4NT is min-max and not RKCB).
If I am absolutely sure that I am looking for slam in , I would bid 4 on 3, to set suit and ask for cues. I can still cue it if partner bids 4 now, denying a stopper in .
If 2 wasn't an absolute GF, 4 may be passed.
Yehudit Hasin

"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
0

#23 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,961
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-04, 06:39

View PostQuantumcat, on 2011-April-03, 05:02, said:

Partner won't have four hearts, or he would have responded 2 not 3.

Anyway, I have an agreement suggestion that covers all possible situations:

If there are two suits to be worried about, we SHOW.
If there are three suits we are worried about, we ASK.

This is because, if there are three suits and we show, partner doesn't know which one of the other suits he needs to have to bid 3NT. So asking is best.


How does this work? How does partner know if you are worried about 2 or 3 suits ?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
(still learning)
"At last: just calm down, this kind of disrupted boards happens every day in our bridge community. It will always be an inherent part of bridge until we move to a modern platform, and then will we have other hopefully less frequent issues." P Swennson
0

#24 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-April-04, 11:09

View PostQuantumcat, on 2011-April-03, 05:02, said:

Partner won't have four hearts, or he would have responded 2 not 3.

Anyway, I have an agreement suggestion that covers all possible situations:

If there are two suits to be worried about, we SHOW.
If there are three suits we are worried about, we ASK.

This is because, if there are three suits and we show, partner doesn't know which one of the other suits he needs to have to bid 3NT. So asking is best.


So when opps have 2 suits bid, and your side has bid one suit, does that mean u still have 3 suits to worry about (2 opps suit + 1 unbid suit) ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#25 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2011-April-06, 21:04

When the opps have bid two suits, that is two suits we are worried about. Not much point being afraid of the unbid suit, if opps have a fit in two suits they can hardly have much attacking power left in the unbid one.
If the opps have not bid, and we have only bid one, there are three.
If the opps have not bid and we have bid two, there are the other two.
I Transfers
0

#26 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-April-07, 06:59

The fact partner doesn't have 4 hearts doesn't precule me from telling partner that I have lenght in a side suit where I need covers, this info is very useful for slam exploration.

3 is natural, that's all, natural on this context means 3+ cards (strong doubleton is possible). It logically implies that if 3NT is my target, I don't stop diamonds. But nobody said yet what my target is.
0

#27 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-April-07, 15:04

View PostQuantumcat, on 2011-April-06, 21:04, said:

When the opps have bid two suits, that is two suits we are worried about. Not much point being afraid of the unbid suit, if opps have a fit in two suits they can hardly have much attacking power left in the unbid one.
If the opps have not bid, and we have only bid one, there are three.
If the opps have not bid and we have bid two, there are the other two.


Okay, thank you.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users