BBO Discussion Forums: Annoying Michaels - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Annoying Michaels

#1 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2011-September-05, 16:03



What say you? 2D was both majors...
0

#2 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2011-September-05, 16:07

Double is likely to be reasonable for any of several understandings as to what it might mean. Can't really fault 3NT either, though.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#3 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2011-September-05, 16:09

Double is for profit, but we're red, they're white: 3NT.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#4 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-September-05, 16:32

3NT looks like a good practical bid at this vulnerability. The axe is at the ready if they choose not to let us play it.
0

#5 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-05, 16:55

I would show a forcing raise in diamonds. We could easily belong in a diamond slam, and if partner wants to bid NT then I would prefer to play it from his side (heart lead and he has the Q for instance, or if he has Axx of spades...not to mention if a club is the right lead LHO will have an easier time doing it than RHO). On top of that if partner has a stiff in a major it is not hard to imagine 5D being better than 3N (I am assuming imps, not specified).

It is possible that we will make their lead decision easier by going slower but I don't think that warrants masterminding it at such an early stage in the auction when we know very little.
0

#6 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2011-September-05, 17:24

Same as Justin ....
2S! ( Un-Un ) = limit+ raise for Diam
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#7 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-September-05, 18:17

I'd like to get 3NT played from partner's side, but have a hard time believing I am ever going to get him to bid it.
0

#8 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-05, 18:32

View PostSiegmund, on 2011-September-05, 18:17, said:

I'd like to get 3NT played from partner's side, but have a hard time believing I am ever going to get him to bid it.


It would not be surprising if partner had one honor in both majors. That said, what is the downside of bidding 2S (or whatever your methods), and seeing if partner has a 2N bid? I don't understand the rush to bid 3N, we have a fine hand for a diamond slam, and a fine hand for partner to bid NT IF he wants to. Of course, if partner doesn't want to bid NT, it might be right to play from our side, imagine LHO with Hxx of hearts and RHO with HT9xx.
0

#9 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-September-05, 18:54

There's no real downside to going slow (giving LHO an easy 3M bid isnt doing much damage since LHO was going to get to lead his better major against my 3NT anyway.) Long as you think you can convince your partner later that you seriously liked the idea of 3NT, and not some oddball hand that only had 3NT as a fallback position if it didn't like opener's rebid.

I'm just not seeing the big upside to going slow either. Partner is allowed to bid over 3NT if he thinks slam is a possibility opposite a 4333 13-15 pointer, too. Put another way, what had DOES bid an immediate 3NT if 4333 13-15 pointers don't? OK, my 15 points could have all been in kings and queens rather than having, especially, the HA.

I have no big complaint with 2S. I just am happy to get my whole hand off my chest in one bid. (And one time I WILL be better placed is if LHO chooses 4M next - p knows I have a trump trick to aid him in the 5m/6m vs X decision, and will have a forcing pass available that he might not if it goes 2S(limit+)-4M. )
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-September-05, 19:21

I can't show a balanced forcing raise in diamonds in standard Michaels defense afaik.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
1

#11 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-September-05, 21:42

View PostPhil, on 2011-September-05, 19:21, said:

I can't show a balanced forcing raise in diamonds in standard Michaels defense afaik.

no, but you can show a limit+ for diamonds and see where the thing is going. Doesn't really matter, I don't think whether you can show everything all at once.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#12 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-September-05, 22:13

View Postaguahombre, on 2011-September-05, 21:42, said:

no, but you can show a limit+ for diamonds and see where the thing is going. Doesn't really matter, I don't think whether you can show everything all at once.


I can show major stoppers and I can show a splinter in a major.

How do I show a diamond raise?
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#13 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2011-September-05, 22:41

2 is played by many as a limit or better raise of diamonds - so-called Unusual over Michaels. 2 would have shown a constructive club bid while 3 directly would have been to play.
0

#14 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-September-05, 22:49

View PostPhil, on 2011-September-05, 22:13, said:

I can show major stoppers and I can show a splinter in a major.

How do I show a diamond raise?


As Arty said, 2, u still have room for stoppers at 3 level.

The way we play it, 3 weak hands, 2 gf hands, DBL invitation hands or will make penalty dbl.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#15 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-06, 01:33

View PostPhil, on 2011-September-05, 22:13, said:

I can show major stoppers and I can show a splinter in a major.

How do I show a diamond raise?


Prioritizing your 2 cuebids as showing a stopper and saying nothing about suit lengths seems extremely bizarre for your first bid of the auction. It is easy to see how if the opponents bid at all you will be in trouble. Even if they pass, it's easy to see this approach not working out.
0

#16 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-September-06, 04:30

My standard defence is that both 2 and 2 show diamond raise showing stopper in the suit bid while 3 is forcing, is this outdated? do you think this is much worse than the unnusual thing?
0

#17 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-September-06, 05:01

View PostFluffy, on 2011-September-06, 04:30, said:

My standard defence is that both 2 and 2 show diamond raise showing stopper in the suit bid while 3 is forcing, is this outdated? do you think this is much worse than the unnusual thing?

It means you can't make a non-forcing bid in clubs (unless you're using 2NT for that?)

With double, 2, 2, 2NT, 3 and 3 available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#18 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,251
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-06, 08:59

3NT.

We are red, they are green, we need to beat 2M -4, so that we have a profit.
Try to teach them, that they revealed to much.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#19 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-September-06, 10:21

View PostFluffy, on 2011-September-06, 04:30, said:

My standard defence is that both 2 and 2 show diamond raise showing stopper in the suit bid while 3 is forcing, is this outdated? do you think this is much worse than the unnusual thing?



View Postgnasher, on 2011-September-06, 05:01, said:

It means you can't make an invitational bid in clubs (unless you're using 2NT for that)

With double, 2, 2, 2NT, 3 and 3 available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.

I think you two are both right on, and the two posts complement each other to clarify the whole structure. However, I took the liberty of changing a word in Gnasher's to distinguish between 3C and 2NT. The players could choose which is invite and which is drop-dead.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#20 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2011-September-06, 13:34

View Postgnasher, on 2011-September-06, 05:01, said:

It means you can't make a non-forcing bid in clubs (unless you're using 2NT for that?)

With double, 2, 2, 2NT, 3 and 3 available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.


Here are the hand types I would like to show with those actions:

- interest in penalising
- clubs non-forcing (constructive)
- clubs forcing
- game forcing diamond raise
- limit diamond raise
- weak diamond raise
- fit bid in clubs

That's 7 hand types and 6 calls, so I still can't quite do it.
[I combine limit in diamonds and FG in diamonds in the standard way to use 2S as limit+, but I'm not convinced that's totally ideal; there's something to be said for giving up the club semi-fit bid (3-5 or 4-5, which we use 2NT for) in favour of showing FG values at once when partner has opened a minor]
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users