what now and why? thx
Hilton Head Regional #1
#3
Posted 2012-February-14, 12:55
JLOGIC, on 2012-February-14, 12:44, said:
Agree. This seems preferable to 4♦, although I may be on shaky ground later.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2012-February-14, 16:31
#6
Posted 2012-February-14, 16:47
What's the chance of that? I don't know.
#7
Posted 2012-February-14, 17:06
#8
Posted 2012-February-15, 02:16
But it is still an ugly problem. I try 4 ♦ as the most descreptive bid.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2012-February-15, 03:12
#10
Posted 2012-February-15, 07:04
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#11
Posted 2012-February-15, 10:40
#12
Posted 2012-February-15, 15:03
whereagles, on 2012-February-14, 15:44, said:
Wimps? I'm bidding 6♥ and standing the 1st round in the bar if I'm wrong. Pard won't get excited by a stiff petunia ♠ but I will and any ♦ bid risks a ♣ lead through the K.
What is baby oil made of?
#13
Posted 2012-February-15, 17:19
bftboy, on 2012-February-15, 10:40, said:
No. Firstly, that hand isn't much above a minimum; secondly 3C should show a decent hand; thirdly, in most situations Western Q is unnecessary because partner will know whether she has a diamond stopper or not without us asking.
With the given opener, 4D feels right. 4H is O.K. on williness to play game in hearts but not quite as descriptive as 4D. 3D could be called on many strong hands, with or without a lot of hearts.