Help
IMPs, 32-board match
Page 1 of 1
two suiter
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 2005-April-06
Posted 2012-March-01, 12:22
IMPs, 32-board match
#2
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2012-March-01, 12:38
2♥ for me.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#3
- Tubthumper
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,835
- Joined: 2007-July-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR, USA
- Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.
Posted 2012-March-01, 12:41
karlson, on 2012-March-01, 12:22, said:
IMPs, 32-board match
I'm torn between cue-bidding and then bidding clubs, or just jumping to 3♣. At the table, I think I'd choose the latter - we have a lot of heart losers to deal with, and righty will be over-ruffing at some point. I also want to cater to partner's inevitable 3♠/3♦ call in the context of having already shown values & a clear preference as to suit.
Chris Gibson
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2012-March-02, 06:53
3 ♣ this deal sucks.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1