BBO Discussion Forums: BBFL team 4 vs team 5 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

BBFL team 4 vs team 5 an intersting hand

#1 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2012-March-11, 21:19



BOTH tables had similar auction, landing in hopeless 3NT, when 6 has a play (and makes as cards are). (at the other table, my hand started with multi 2D .. the auction was

2d - p - 2h - 3d
p 3h - x - xx
p 3N

How should the auction go?

--Ben--

#2 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-11, 22:21

Hard to fault South.

From North's point of view, South could have a number of different hands where 3NT is best. But I still think it's a close call and North should maybe prefer 5 to 3NT.
0

#3 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-12, 01:38

Certainly easy to see what north was thinking. His 3 small hearts look very NTy, the rest of his hand looks good for 5D. I could easily see duplicating this auction.
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-March-12, 03:28

I think that there are more handtypes, where 5 is superior. But of course, if partner had the other black queen, I would regret my choice.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users