BBO Discussion Forums: Double shot ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Double shot ?

#21 User is offline   axman 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 926
  • Joined: 2009-July-29
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-August-06, 13:09

View Postblackshoe, on 2012-August-04, 14:34, said:


Assumption. How do you know what the WBFLC knows full well?


The provision has not been removed.


View Postblackshoe, on 2012-August-04, 14:34, said:


Uh, huh. With whom did you consult?

It is not the concession, nor the rejection of the concession, that is the problem here. It is the postulated prior agreement by this pair that one player will concede with the missing card in a "two way finesse" situation and his partner will immediately object. If that's not a violation of Law 73B2 then we might as well throw the law book in the trash. All TD rulings will then become very simple: "sorry, there's nothing I can do. There are no rules in this game." :o :(


My recollection includes Stevenson, Burn, and Probst.
Bridge is a game and I will remember that its place in my life is that of a game. I will respect those who play and endeavor to be worthy of their respect. I will remember that it is the most human of activities which makes bridge so interesting. And in doing so I will contribute my best and strive to conduct myself fairly. -Bridge Player’s Creed
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users