Help
What is the name of it if anyone knows?
Both opps guarding the same suit along with 1 card in their own.
Page 1 of 1
I am curious... What is the technical term for this squeeze?
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 581
- Joined: 2012-January-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sweden
- Interests:Bridge...some other things too I suppose.
Posted 2012-September-01, 14:28
Let's try to ignore my horrible play after trick 4 and pretend I was trying to setup this squeeze that I completely ruined...lol...I was guarding against that tricky 2nd K of ♣ that the opponents snuck into the deck...
What is the name of it if anyone knows?
Both opps guarding the same suit along with 1 card in their own.
What is the name of it if anyone knows?
Both opps guarding the same suit along with 1 card in their own.
♠♥♦♣ The American Swede of BBF...I eat my meatballs with blueberries, okay? ♣♦♥♠
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 581
- Joined: 2012-January-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sweden
- Interests:Bridge...some other things too I suppose.
Posted 2012-September-01, 14:29
Fixed the size. 
♠♥♦♣ The American Swede of BBF...I eat my meatballs with blueberries, okay? ♣♦♥♠
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,841
- Joined: 2007-January-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Exeter, UK
-
Interests:EBU/EBL TD
Bridge, Cinema, Theatre, Food,
[Walking - not so much]
Posted 2012-September-01, 16:11
A (simultaneous) double squeeze - entry in the suit guarded by both opponents, opponents' side-suit guards in the hands under the threat cards.
Robin
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
#4
- Scotland
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,754
- Joined: 2008-August-22
- Gender:Male
- Location:Scotland
Posted 2012-September-02, 01:49
RMB1, on 2012-September-01, 16:11, said:
A (simultaneous) double squeeze - entry in the suit guarded by both opponents, opponents' side-suit guards in the hands under the threat cards.
A simultaneous double squeeze refers to a whole class of double, triple, and compound squeezes. The specific name for the squeeze given about is the positional double squeeze, as the position in which the menaces are guarded is important. (it is also just the `normal' double squeeze).
The non positional double squeeze normally refers to this position:
where now the position of the menaces in the defenders hand is not important (provided they are split), but you have to guess which one holds which.
Alternatively what is normally called the automatic double squeeze has an extended menace, so there is no need for declarer to discard a menace.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#5
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2012-September-03
Posted 2012-September-03, 01:40
phil_20686, on 2012-September-02, 01:49, said:
A simultaneous double squeeze refers to a whole class of double, triple, and compound squeezes. The specific name for the squeeze given about is the positional double squeeze, as the position in which the menaces are guarded is important. (it is also just the `normal' double squeeze).
The non positional double squeeze normally refers to this position:
where now the position of the menaces in the defenders hand is not important (provided they are split), but you have to guess which one holds which.
Alternatively what is normally called the automatic double squeeze has an extended menace, so there is no need for declarer to discard a menace.
The non positional double squeeze normally refers to this position:
where now the position of the menaces in the defenders hand is not important (provided they are split), but you have to guess which one holds which.
Alternatively what is normally called the automatic double squeeze has an extended menace, so there is no need for declarer to discard a menace.
nice one
Page 1 of 1