Advancing a 1S overcall Strong hand with no good bid
#1
Posted 2013-January-15, 08:58
♥AQ98
♦J6
♣QJT72
(1♣) - 1♠ - (pass) - ?
None vul.
You have agreed to play transfer responses:
2♦ would show a heart suit, at least 5 cards.
2♥ would show 10+ with a 3-card fit.
2NT would show a 4-card fit.
What would you do?
#2
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:00
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:04
#4
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:18
So, I have no way to force without a fit, but 2 ♥, 2♠, 2 NT, 3♠, 4 ♣ and 4♠ as raises....
I know, everything is a nice to have, but maybe at least one cheap bid should show a good hand without a stopper... Or is it impossible to hold AQ, Qxxx,AQxx,xxx?- maybe even with one honour more or less....
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:31
Codo, on 2013-January-15, 09:18, said:
So, I have no way to force without a fit, but 2 ♥, 2♠, 2 NT, 3♠, 4 ♣ and 4♠ as raises....
I know, everything is a nice to have, but maybe at least one cheap bid should show a good hand without a stopper... Or is it impossible to hold AQ, Qxxx,AQxx,xxx?- maybe even with one honour more or less....
3♣, 3♦, 3♥ and 4♦ would also be raises in our system.
If you have any good suggestions about system I would love to hear them.
#6
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:32
#7
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:32
Fluffy, on 2013-January-15, 09:04, said:
If you bid 2♥, then you'll get the expected 2♠ response. Then what?
#8
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:35
(I play the same methods, except that when the 1♣ may be short we play 1NT is a transfer to clubs)
#9
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:35
jogs, on 2013-January-15, 09:32, said:
1♠ is normal, aggressive style. Like 8-17.
#10
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:49
mfa1010, on 2013-January-15, 09:31, said:
If you have any good suggestions about system I would love to hear them.
We play transfer as well, but the cue keeps its meaning, 2NT is transfer to whatever / the next
reasonable suit, it is sometimes a bit asymmetric.
This is not perfect, but at least you have a come on signal available, asking partner to tell more.
The downside, you loose the option to show a good raise with 4 card support.
If this is any better to current your structure, ..., depenps, matter of taste.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2013-January-15, 09:51
I will bid 3NT later, if partner showes some live, and he does not show any
live, if he merely bids 2S, which I will pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:01
mfa1010, on 2013-January-15, 09:32, said:
3NT ... offering a choice of games
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I see Marlowe ( previous post ) had the same idea and posted it as I was slow typing .
This post has been edited by TWO4BRIDGE: 2013-January-15, 10:03
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#13
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:07
#14
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:10
Codo, on 2013-January-15, 09:18, said:
So, I have no way to force without a fit, but 2 ♥, 2♠, 2 NT, 3♠, 4 ♣ and 4♠ as raises....
I know, everything is a nice to have, but maybe at least one cheap bid should show a good hand without a stopper... Or is it impossible to hold AQ, Qxxx,AQxx,xxx?- maybe even with one honour more or less....
mfa1010, on 2013-January-15, 09:31, said:
If you have any good suggestions about system I would love to hear them.
So in your system, after a 1♠ overcall, you have at least ten (!) raises, only two ways to reach NT, and seemingly no way at all to show a minor suit? Seems a little strange, but no apparent harm done, I just bash 3NT.
-gwnn
#15
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:56
billw55, on 2013-January-15, 10:10, said:
Many forum members have 13 after their side opens 1S. Seems like a downward step in the right direction
#16
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:57
Cyberyeti, on 2013-January-15, 10:07, said:
I feel that giving up on a having natural 1NT is a much too big a price to pay for being able to show the opponent's opening suit naturally, even if 1♣ could be short.
So I'm not hooked on making that change. 1NT comes up a lot.
#17
Posted 2013-January-15, 10:59
billw55, on 2013-January-15, 10:10, said:
I could bid 2♣ over 1♠ to show a diamond suit. It is only the enemy's opening suit, I can't show.
#18
Posted 2013-January-15, 11:09
Although this hand is probably too good anyway, I hate not having a natural 2NT bid here. The overcall range is so wide that I think you need it. You will be completely screwed on hands that wanted to make that bid if it's not available. If it was available I might even do it since partner will pass my 3NT on some hands with six spades or four hearts where he would bid over 2NT.
- billw55
#19
Posted 2013-January-15, 11:28
lalldonn, on 2013-January-15, 11:09, said:
That's a good point. We play 2NT as 10+ with 4 card fit and 3♣ as a mixed raise. 3♦ and 3♥ are fit bids that never seem to come up anyway. Maybe it is better to rotate some of the bids so there will be room for a natural 2N.
In the club last Thursday, I had: ♠-, ♥QJT7, ♦AT985, ♣AKT8. Here the bidding went (1♦)-1♠-(pass), and I was screwed also. NV vs V I tried 1N, which worked out ok but didn't have to.