paulg, on 2013-February-24, 02:07, said:
I know that you will not generally be sacrificing at unfavourable vulnerability, but I don't think a direct raise of a weak jump overcall should ever create a forcing pass situation. If you want to create a FP, then you should have to cue bid on the way to establish it.
You are right, I was wrong on what were FP auctions. We use Neil Kimelman's FP rules;
1. When your partnership has made a bid that has created a game forcing auction, the opponents cannot play a contract undoubled.
1S (P) 2H (5D)
2. Besides hands where the partnership is in a game forcing auction, forcing pass also applies when one hand opens and the other hand shows at least invitational values.
1S (P) 3D* (5D)
3) When your partnership bids game, and you are vulnerable versus nonvulnerable opponents.
V vs. NV (P) 1S (2H) 2S (4H) 4S (5H) ?
My partners and I play this is a forcing pass situation. At any other vulnerability it is not. This to me is a reasonable treatment, but may not be universal. The logic behind this agreement is that we should have extra values to bid game with a risk of being doubled for -200, -500 or more, versus 420 for the opponents.
4) When the opponents preempt and your partnership bids game.
1H (3S) 4H (4S)
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe