Pairs.
An easy one?
#1
Posted 2013-August-14, 08:08
Pairs.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#2
Posted 2013-August-14, 08:14
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#3
Posted 2013-August-14, 08:31
-gwnn
#4
Posted 2013-August-14, 08:39
#5
Posted 2013-August-14, 08:50
billw55, on 2013-August-14, 08:31, said:
I think QT9x / xx / xx / KTxxx is a far easier 4S than this, which is flat and defensive. Do we think that our stiff heart is a ruffing value?
edit: that problem was also R/W teams, rather than R/R pairs...
broze, on 2013-August-14, 08:39, said:
Well, I passed at the table, but without getting into the results, I polled a lot of people and found 4S to be pretty standard. But I think a lot of time the population at large diverges from the forum at large. Like I have it in my head that MrAce is going to pass, for example
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#6
Posted 2013-August-14, 09:32
wyman, on 2013-August-14, 08:50, said:
edit: that problem was also R/W teams, rather than R/R pairs...
I didn't say it was identical. Just that it is similar enough for my answer to be the same.
As to defense, both hands have one king and one queen. Partner made a takeout double (not overcall), so I don't auto-assume the ♣Q is better than the ♠Q on defense.
And sure, why shouldn't the stiff heart be a ruffing value? Do your ops always have 11 trumps on this auction?
-gwnn
#7
Posted 2013-August-14, 09:45
billw55, on 2013-August-14, 09:32, said:
Kxxx is more defensive than Kxxxx when partner's made a TOX, though, no?
Anyway, I am not arguing that pass is better than 4S here; I'm just saying that to me 4S looks more likely to be right on the hand you linked to than this one.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#8
Posted 2013-August-14, 12:19
as usual in these types of problems I assume the opps and pard are excellent players.
#9
Posted 2013-August-14, 12:24
mike777, on 2013-August-14, 12:19, said:
as usual in these types of problems I assume the opps and pard are excellent players.
The opps are seriously WC. Partner is at least as good as I am. I don't consider myself an excellent player, but partner's doubles are both very normal.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff

Help
