Alert viewble for both opponents and partner
#1
Posted 2016-January-01, 02:42
#2
Posted 2016-January-01, 07:01
Seeing partner's explanations and using the information is just too much of a distortion, while checking the CC is probably pretty normal in online play.
#3
Posted 2016-January-01, 07:57
Vampyr, on 2016-January-01, 07:01, said:
Seeing partner's explanations and using the information is just too much of a distortion, while checking the CC is probably pretty normal in online play.
If you see my Profile it could be clear also, as you knew, for keycard-Oklahoma (jumping in 4x preempt). But the point is ,i.e. 1NT, that partner don't see it and If use weak NT or Rkb 03 instead 14 to give a wrong information . Instead making explanation in yellow box for all players allows this one is avoided, play is improved, resulting and bidding are ok and players are all happy returning to play again vs bad resulting and relatives conseguences, bye. I hope this my can be apply.
#4
Posted 2016-January-01, 11:34
#5
Posted 2016-January-01, 13:32
#6
Posted 2016-January-01, 13:51
#7
Posted 2016-January-02, 00:57
This post has been edited by Lovera: 2016-February-28, 09:46
#8
Posted 2016-January-03, 04:45
#9
Posted 2016-January-03, 15:44
If you do try to do this, you may be able to get help from people who've done it before by posting in the "Dealer and Full Disclosure' forum.
#10
Posted 2016-January-03, 16:42
barmar, on 2016-January-03, 15:44, said:
If you do try to do this, you may be able to get help from people who've done it before by posting in the "Dealer and Full Disclosure' forum.
Yes, i know it because few time ago i've found by searching box this information about Convention Card and seems that was indicate at the end of GIB Card explanation in Home. Although my idea by-pass it because is easier to make needing indicate only most used bidding (as RKB, NT, and others already told) but with different answers that are in a limitate number. Than i hope BBO can consider favoureble it.
#11
Posted 2016-January-04, 08:29
barmar, on 2016-January-03, 15:44, said:
If you do try to do this, you may be able to get help from people who've done it before by posting in the "Dealer and Full Disclosure' forum.
Maybe Kungsgeten's markup language is the way to go?
http://www.bridgebas...ull-disclosure/
#12
Posted 2016-January-04, 09:30
#13
Posted 2016-January-07, 20:36
Yes, to upload the bbs file for full disclosure you needs to use the windows version. Once loaded you can use in browser version.
There are already full disclosure cards readily available on BBO for 2/1, SAYC, Precision, WJ2005, Old Acol, Goren Kiss, BBO Italian and French Standard.
If you look around the web you can find other systems available. You can edit these to your hearts content making them simple or as detailed as you want.
http://fulldisclosur...ebsites.net/FD/
Why you would need for RKCB I don't know? It's not alertable and people play different ace asking bids.
Full disclosure never caught on which I think is too bad,. I suspect because of the amount of work needed for each partnership.
#14
Posted 2016-January-07, 21:40
steve2005, on 2016-January-07, 20:36, said:
Yes, to upload the bbs file for full disclosure you needs to use the windows version. Once loaded you can use in browser version.
There are already full disclosure cards readily available on BBO for 2/1, SAYC, Precision, WJ2005, Old Acol, Goren Kiss, BBO Italian and French Standard.
......
Full disclosure never caught on which I think is too bad,. I suspect because of the amount of work needed for each partnership.
But you can, especially if playing with pickups partnerships, either create a card that you prefer or use one of the available ones as written.
#15
Posted 2016-January-08, 08:23
steve2005, on 2016-January-07, 20:36, said:
Yes, to upload the bbs file for full disclosure you needs to use the windows version. Once loaded you can use in browser version.
There are already full disclosure cards readily available on BBO for 2/1, SAYC, Precision, WJ2005, Old Acol, Goren Kiss, BBO Italian and French Standard.
If you look around the web you can find other systems available. You can edit these to your hearts content making them simple or as detailed as you want.
http://fulldisclosur...ebsites.net/FD/
Why you would need for RKCB I don't know? It's not alertable and people play different ace asking bids.
Full disclosure never caught on which I think is too bad,. I suspect because of the amount of work needed for each partnership.
For "spot" sake it's better here (i'm quitely sealing to 3.000 about views) than FD and Dealer section (almost specific about informatic language - i suggest to open all topics for seven pages clicking at bottom - that i know very little and if someone can help me thx in advance). After having seen probably it's close to my system - a sort of Stayman advanced integrates with transferts and RKBs - Goren KISS needing although any modify processed (how ?) or if anyone can tell me about Stayman published around .. A good news is that RKB (what partner ? 03 or 14 .) is not ultheriorly developed. I think it is only explaining until second round usefull to drive bidding at table.
#17
Posted 2016-January-12, 13:53
Vampyr, on 2016-January-07, 21:40, said:
I'm getting back from the table of JEC "TEAM CAYNE/STARS" and i have seen NS convention card (2/1) similar as card at GIB CC and subsequently EW convention card instead represented in this way "System Summary 2/1(first line) NT openings 1NT 15-17 2NT ..(second line) etc. Than there is the possibility to have a CC more simple to compilate if we are referring to CC by NS, is it right ? If EW CC was actived we can have a sort of profile in standard mode and similar for everybodies. I have seen that problem to bild it seems to be many requering different and complex operations (for instance i don't get to enter password in Web Client probably for a blocking of any type).
#18
Posted 2016-January-16, 01:29