Good hand but they double our 1NT
#1
Posted 2018-July-05, 15:54
x
x
KQxxx
QJTxxx
For better or worse, you pass as dealer. It goes
pass-(1♥)-1NT-x
?
What now? You play that xx is a one-suited take-out while other bids are two-suited takeouts. 2♥ would be "Stayman", not sure if it promises spades or is just a generic force. This hasn't been discussed.
#2
Posted 2018-July-05, 16:50
Opener might have opened light with shape, and partner may have upgraded his 14 count hand with ♥ honours over opener, and opener's partner doubled with holdings in the other three suits. The hand could be quite distributional except for your partner, so I'll content myself with 3 of a minor for a plus score, though there is a case for making one last try after partner bids 3♣/3♦ over 2NT by splintering one of the major suit singletons. Partner needs very little for 5 of a minor to be a realistic contract.
Yes, it is difficult
#3
Posted 2018-July-05, 16:57
helene_t, on 2018-July-05, 15:54, said:
x
x
KQxxx
QJTxxx
while other bids are two-suited takeouts.
2nt for minors?
2nt for the minors followed by 4♣ over a 3♦ preference from pard should send them into the tank but with a chance to go right. Too much to ask as a passed hand though.
If I thought I could get away with it, redouble and run to my "1-suiter" should eventually get me doubled in something that makes. I'm a passed hand that sounds weak. ie. if I redouble, pard bids 2♣ - pass to me I'm passing and lho is forced to do something.
What is baby oil made of?
#4
Posted 2018-July-06, 05:42
FelicityR, on 2018-July-05, 16:50, said:
Doubler may not have enough points to legitimately set 1N.
However has good enough hearts expects to knock out partner's stopper(s) and run some heart tricks,
Clearly you have enough points to make 1N often. The only question is can you take 7 tricks before partner's major suit stoppers are gone? If you pass 1NX there is a good chance you play it there.
If you had this hand opposite a 1NT opening I don't think you would be allowed to play 1NX. Opponents will have too many major suit cards and not enough points to leave in.
#5
Posted 2018-July-06, 06:20
steve2005, on 2018-July-06, 05:42, said:
Doubler may not have enough points to legitimately set 1N.
I thought of this when I wrote my initial post. But who's holding all the ♠s then? If partner has a five card suit opposite a passed partner I'd rather him/her overcall 1♠ than 1NT even with 15-17 - others commentators may not agree with this.
#6
Posted 2018-July-06, 06:45
I would have opened 2NT (both minors), but now it is more tricky, since the villains almost certainly hold an eight-card or longer spade fit and it is the sort of wild distribution where it is often possible to make lots of tricks with few points. I will start with the two-suited take-out, not expecting it to end the auction. I will compete to the four-level, but not the five-level at these colours - but maybe partner can bid on if a fit is unearthed.
#7
Posted 2018-July-06, 07:00
at IMPS I would be less inclined to gamble (I would make whatever bid needed to show both minors) since game is hardly out of consideration. At MP playing 1nx looks like it just might be the top spot w/o the risk associated with getting hammered that is associated with IMPS (its only 1 board).
#8
Posted 2018-July-06, 10:29
FelicityR, on 2018-July-06, 06:20, said:
You partner can certainly have 4 spades
Doubler can have spades and hearts support
There is no reason to assume partner has 5 spades.
#9
Posted 2018-July-06, 12:53
#11
Posted 2018-July-07, 01:20
I really don't like that stiff ♠ in this hand. Rather than worry about whether ♠ break 4-4-4-1, I'd be more worried about someone having a running ♠ suit, likely the doubler, and making a match point judgment that 1 NTx going down would be better than a ♠ partial. After all, you are red.
In that case, you might just shoehorn the points into the various hands to make this auction make sense.
So I'm doing the pedestrian thing and settling for the bid that shows the minors whatever the agreement is.
#12
Posted 2018-July-07, 15:59
#13
Posted 2018-July-09, 00:59
(1) Bid 4♥ and convert 4♠ to 5♣ (this assumes opener showed 5+♥), or
(2) Just bid 5♣
why mess around?