BBO Discussion Forums: Robot didn't take the setting trick! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Robot didn't take the setting trick! the A later got ruffed

#1 User is offline   mikl_plkcc 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 704
  • Joined: 2008-November-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:sailing, bridge

Posted 2025-July-15, 07:36



The robot refused to set the contract with the ♣A, and let them made the doubled game!
0

#2 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,282
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2025-July-15, 08:44

Why torture yourself with bots? :)
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
0

#3 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,222
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-July-15, 17:11

Good defense by GIB to hold the contract to making 3. Lesser robots would have allowed an overtrick.
0

#4 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,576
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-July-15, 21:37

There really should be a forum for GIB posting about all of the countless things its human partners do wrong.
A better handviewer
Reverse engineering GIB, part 1: A treatise on the insanity of bidding simulations
1

#5 User is offline   msheald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 2021-March-17

Posted Today, 06:30

Hello! For my own education, I'd be curious to know ops change in position should Gib have taken the setting trick. I have not looked at the hand closely, but it is possible that taking the ace would have opened up other lines of play. In the event that it would have been the setting trick, knowing the point change between the two outcomes would be helpful in knowing how to play with Gib in the future.

Lastly, it would be helpful for those with program simulators to run 5000 deals to see what average results would be with different lines of play. As David Bird notes in "Winning Duplicate Tactics," a single deal means nothing, but the good player plays to maximize outcome over many deals. Best regards.

Mike
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users