This is where the fun stopped
#1
Posted 2025-July-25, 21:20
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#3
Posted Yesterday, 07:41
I think I’m worth a boost: 3S
#4
Posted Yesterday, 10:37
As for Winston’s reference to North not bidding notrump, I think that’s irrelevant. He’d not bid notrump merely because he has heart values if he also has the good 6 card spade suit this auction shows.
I’m torn between 3S and 4S….if my heart Queen were elsewhere, I’d even consider 3H! I choose 3S because I’m inferring matchpoints. I’d probably do the same at imps because we’re not vulnerable. Reverse the vulnerability and I’d bid 4S at imps.
#5
Posted Yesterday, 10:58
Or even 21 HCP and same shape + weakness?
#6
Posted Yesterday, 11:12
shyams, on 2025-July-26, 10:58, said:
Or even 21 HCP and same shape + weakness?
On this auction, we get to assume partner has around 7 HCP, as such game is in the picture. I believe your options are double, again, or 3H cuebid.
#7
Posted Yesterday, 11:25
shyams, on 2025-July-26, 10:58, said:
Or even 21 HCP and same shape + weakness?
It depends. xxx in hearts is a horrible holding and one that would cause me to be cautious. I think you can create a hand on which I’d bid 2S but I’d often have overcalled 1S with that hand. I am an adherent of the late Eric Kokish’s ideas about virtually unlimited..I don’t mean actually unlimited…overcalls.
21 hcp…ok…that’s too rich even for me as a 1S bid. But I have trouble picturing a 5332 hand, including say Jxx in hearts…that wouldn’t reopen with a double or a pass. After all, they are red v white and with 21 hcp and 5332 shape, we have a good chance of doing better on defence than offence.
Bear in mind that, on this hand, it would be weird for advancer to worry about partner holding 21 hcp…that gives both opps a combined 14 count. Even allowing for a 3rd seat opening bid, they are red v white so I think it’s unrealistic to plan one’s actions on the assumptions that neither has anything. Nobody psyches red v white…nobody did it 50 years ago when psyching was fairly common…..and these days many club players seem to think that psyching is or should be illegal, lol.
#8
Posted Yesterday, 14:16
you have to raise, you hav 1 1/2 - 2 tricks for p, you could have nothing.
3S vs. 4S is certainly the only question, ..., it depends a bit how strong you need to be,
to make the T/O instead of overcalling.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted Yesterday, 14:22
more later
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#10
Posted Yesterday, 18:18
My X's here are basically shape, with this hand I bid 1♠, but it's close. Do I need to rethink passout seat?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#11
Posted Yesterday, 19:01
jillybean, on 2025-July-26, 18:18, said:
My X's here are basically shape, with this hand I bid 1♠, but it's close. Do I need to rethink passout seat?
I am a big believer, as I said above, about simple overcalls on strong hands, but this one is, imo, a clear double then spades. It’s not just a 17 count…I have no problem overcalling with 17 or even more but it’s a huge playing hand full of controls and with a very good 6 card suit. While I’m hesitant to say that you lost your mind, I think you’d be in a very tiny minority if you overcalled 1S.
Remove a spade…put it into a minor for example, and you have the same great 17 coun5 but the hand is a full trick weaker in playing strength. Now I bid 1S.
Hand evaluation is about far more than hcp…far more than just controls. That spade 6 is worth more than, say, the diamond King….which might grow up on the auction but your sixth spade, in such a strong suit, has already grown up into a trick.
#12
Posted Yesterday, 23:29
mike777, on 2025-July-26, 11:12, said:
No, we don't. That's a bad rule of thumb in general and it's especially bad here with something like 32-34 HCP already accounted for from the auction. Basically for South to *ever* have 7 on this auction the other 3 must be (sub)minimum for their actions so far.