COMPUTER virous is that a PROBLEM? PLS DONT MAKE ME LAUGH MR BILL GATE.
#1
Posted 2007-September-30, 10:27
1. Virous check on senders end, you write virous code you canot transmit, you remove this protection computer wont work.
2. Hard code all sensitive dangerous location on hardware blackbox, , have to call first to transmit.
Made download hardware function with proper security.
On my last account, Microsoft is counting expenses. But the virous check at senders end is very easy and inexpensive. It dont need and hardware modifications or replacement, neither any lengthy software developments. All we have to do contact all computer security check companies, pay them reasonable amounts, and my 15% gross. The said companies can implement them with 4 IF statement, I am sure they know, update or install security package for their respective clients.
shubi, Canada, root, India.
just noticed, thanks Gerard.
#2
Posted 2007-September-30, 11:43
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 06:27 PM, said:
1. Virous check on senders end, you write virous code you canot transmit, you remove this protection computer wont work.
2. Hard code all sensitive dangerous location on hardware blackbox, , have to call first to transmit.
Made download hardware function with proper security.
Pure rubbish. Yesterday I reported a phising mail to Paypal Security Team.
I received a mail stating correct sender - the site I entered was a true copy of Paypal site. All formalia fully correct. Paypal confirmed immediately to me it really was a phising mail - and they started immediately to work to reduce possible damage this site may cause to thousends of innocent persons.
What made me suspicious was that the mail arrived to me in the wrong mailbox, not the one I use for Paypal. Second the site I entered my Ebay account guide verified it was no verified Ebay site.
The security measures saved me from bank-robbery. You don't think this is worth a little time or?
#3
Posted 2007-September-30, 13:58
#5
Posted 2007-September-30, 19:15
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 01:58 PM, said:
Sounds like a good plan, I volunteer to manage the money.
#6
Posted 2007-September-30, 19:31
#7
Posted 2007-September-30, 22:36
cherdano, on Sep 30 2007, 08:15 PM, said:
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 01:58 PM, said:
Sounds like a good plan, I volunteer to manage the money.
Sorry Arend, job is taken.
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2007-October-01, 00:08
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 02:58 PM, said:
1/3+1/3+1/2+0.1 = okay okay... how was i taught to do this in grade school? =
1/3 + 1/3 + 1/2 + 1/10 = (now the LCM, right? is that 6? no... maybe 15? 20? 30!)
10/30 + 10/30+15/30+3/30 =
damn... wtf is the calculator...
focus matt, focus
20/60+18/60
no... that can't be right
oh. right... you don't add the denominators....
20/30+18/30=
38/30 = 30/30+8/30 = 1 + 4/15
ohoh
i musta done something wrong
that's more than 1.
HELP!
#9
Posted 2007-October-01, 01:16
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 02:58 PM, said:
Hey!
What did IBM do to you?
We built an OS which is 100% virus proof (os/400) and one that 99.9% virus proof (IBM Linux), the latter of which will run just fine on your PC. If you want to run Microsoft Windows with Outlook, that's your choice, but it's not we didn't give you other options.
Me, I say we start charging a penny per email. That'll get most of the spammers and the virus boys out in a hurry. For ordinary folks, it'll only be a dollar or two at most a month. Hopefully your provider will be able to discount that much because of the lack of spam they have to handle.
All opinions are my own, not IBM's.
#10
Posted 2007-October-01, 01:42
matmat, on Sep 30 2007, 10:08 PM, said:
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 02:58 PM, said:
1/3+1/3+1/2+0.1 = okay okay... how was i taught to do this in grade school? =
1/3 + 1/3 + 1/2 + 1/10 = (now the LCM, right? is that 6? no... maybe 15? 20? 30!)
10/30 + 10/30+15/30+3/30 =
damn... wtf is the calculator...
focus matt, focus
20/60+18/60
no... that can't be right
oh. right... you don't add the denominators....
20/30+18/30=
38/30 = 30/30+8/30 = 1 + 4/15
ohoh
i musta done something wrong
that's more than 1.
HELP!
I thought that we've already covered how we aren't up to Shubi's level in mathematical prowess.
#12
Posted 2007-October-01, 02:46
Quote
Well nowadays it's more important to know what you're doing rather than to get the right answer anyway...
#13
Posted 2007-October-01, 06:31
Elianna, on Oct 1 2007, 02:42 AM, said:
sorry. my math is a bit rusty. i must have been wrong.
#14
Posted 2007-October-01, 06:41
Gerben42, on Oct 1 2007, 03:46 AM, said:
ah. that would explain some things at work. thanks gerben! i needed that!
#16
Posted 2007-October-01, 06:42
jtfanclub, on Oct 1 2007, 02:16 AM, said:
What did IBM do to you?
We built an OS which is 100% virus proof (os/400) and one that 99.9% virus proof (IBM Linux), the latter of which will run just fine on your PC. If you want to run Microsoft Windows with Outlook, that's your choice, but it's not we didn't give you other options.
Me, I say we start charging a penny per email. That'll get most of the spammers and the virus boys out in a hurry. For ordinary folks, it'll only be a dollar or two at most a month. Hopefully your provider will be able to discount that much because of the lack of spam they have to handle.
All opinions are my own, not IBM's.
everyone knows that big blue is the devil... only secondary to that redmond devil...
#17
Posted 2007-October-01, 10:43
jtfanclub, on Oct 1 2007, 01:16 AM, said:
shubi, on Sep 30 2007, 02:58 PM, said:
Hey!
What did IBM do to you?
We built an OS which is 100% virus proof (os/400) and one that 99.9% virus proof (IBM Linux), the latter of which will run just fine on your PC. If you want to run Microsoft Windows with Outlook, that's your choice, but it's not we didn't give you other options.
(...)
All opinions are my own, not IBM's.
I sure hope so. I can't believe your claim that os/400 is 100% virus proof, but since I don't know anything about that OS I won't comment. Certainly IBM Linux isn't 99.9% virus proof. First of all IBM Linux doesn't exist, and secondly no Linux is 99.9% virus proof.
#18
Posted 2007-October-01, 11:05
cherdano, on Oct 1 2007, 11:43 AM, said:
17 years and counting, not a single virus on OS/400.
http://www-03.ibm.com/linux/
IBM Linux is a form of Red Hat Linux, designed for larger systems.
#19
Posted 2007-October-01, 11:11
jtfanclub, on Oct 1 2007, 12:05 PM, said:
http://www-03.ibm.com/linux/
IBM Linux is a form of Red Hat Linux, designed for larger systems.
no offence, but i would guess there are lots of proprietary server only systems that have not had many (if any) viruses written for them.
start putting them on 10-20million low end (or however many) new computers each year and we'll see what happens.
#20
Posted 2007-October-01, 11:38
matmat, on Oct 1 2007, 12:11 PM, said:
None taken. The point is, IBM doesn't make stuff that gets hit by viruses much, so why should we be singled out for paying for damage caused by viruses? Or Sun, or any of the other high end systems providers?
I can't believe some people still use Outlook, in spite of it being known to be unbelievably vulnerable to viruses. You get a virus using Outlook, you've got to take part of the blame, IMHO.