Any one has a robust set of conditions in which Good Bad 2NT is applied.
My pd & I seem to get into problems, each one having a different understanding of when this would apply invariably leading to misunderstandings and botched auctions.
Any help would be appreciated.
Page 1 of 1
Good BAD 2NT Conditions?
#2
Posted 2008-November-15, 22:25
Start with two auctions:
1x - (pass / dbl / 1y) - (2x/2z) - 2N and
1x - (pass / dbl / 1y) - 1y - 2z; 2N
Personally I think G/B 2N should be a defined and not a default bid of 2N.
1x - (pass / dbl / 1y) - (2x/2z) - 2N and
1x - (pass / dbl / 1y) - 1y - 2z; 2N
Personally I think G/B 2N should be a defined and not a default bid of 2N.
"Phil" on BBO
#3
Posted 2008-November-16, 12:30
We have these easy rules:
If pd passes, 2 NT is a two suiter, f.e 1 ♣ (1 ♥) pass (2 ♥) 2 NT shows clubs with some diamonds.
If pd doubles, 2 NT without a jump is lebensohl,f.e.
(2 ♥) X (pass) 2 NT
If pd bids a suit, 2 NT is a better raise or a suit which you cannot bid direct.
F.E. 1♥ (2♠) 2 NT is a good heart raise or a 7-10 HCP hand in a minor. (Íf there is no more open suit, which responder can have, then 2 NT is just the good raise.)
Maybe this is not always the best approach, but it is always well defined when 2 NT is good/bad, when it is leb. and when it is a two suiter.
If pd passes, 2 NT is a two suiter, f.e 1 ♣ (1 ♥) pass (2 ♥) 2 NT shows clubs with some diamonds.
If pd doubles, 2 NT without a jump is lebensohl,f.e.
(2 ♥) X (pass) 2 NT
If pd bids a suit, 2 NT is a better raise or a suit which you cannot bid direct.
F.E. 1♥ (2♠) 2 NT is a good heart raise or a 7-10 HCP hand in a minor. (Íf there is no more open suit, which responder can have, then 2 NT is just the good raise.)
Maybe this is not always the best approach, but it is always well defined when 2 NT is good/bad, when it is leb. and when it is a two suiter.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2008-November-16, 13:10
My rule is:
2NT is good-bad whenever opener's RHO bids below 2NT, regardless of what his pard bid.
It shows a min or max hand, e.g. something like 11-14 OR 18-20. With 15-17, you bid the suit(s) right away.
2NT is good-bad whenever opener's RHO bids below 2NT, regardless of what his pard bid.
It shows a min or max hand, e.g. something like 11-14 OR 18-20. With 15-17, you bid the suit(s) right away.
#6
Posted 2008-November-18, 06:03
For us Good-Bad is the default meaning unless
explicit defined other wise.
It works.
With kind regards
Marlowe
explicit defined other wise.
It works.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2008-November-24, 09:58
We define it as whenever opponents have bid and raised a suit, either explicitly or implicitly.
1♠-(X)-2♣-(2♥) would be a good-bad 2N auction for us, as the doubler has hearts, too, and of course the more mundane (1♠)-X-(2♠)-2N would now be good-bad for us.
1♠-(X)-2♣-(2♥) would be a good-bad 2N auction for us, as the doubler has hearts, too, and of course the more mundane (1♠)-X-(2♠)-2N would now be good-bad for us.
Chris Gibson
Page 1 of 1

Help
