BBO Discussion Forums: A few more from the NAOP's - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A few more from the NAOP's

#1 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-November-16, 21:08

All MPs

1.
Scoring: MP


Pass - Pass - Pass - 1;
Pass - 2 - Double - Pass;
2N - AP

Pard leads the 6, T, K, 7

Now what?


2. QJT9 AK732 75 74

1 - Double - 2N - Pass;
4 - Pass - ?


3. KJ84 96 K63 QJ42 (Opps vul)

1 - pass - pass - ?


4. J6 A95 QJ A87632

1 - pass - ?

(2 is GF; 3 is invitational.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-November-16, 21:14

1. I'll think about this a little later on.
2. 4, partner doesn't have resplendent trumps but he knows that I have *something*.
3. looks like a textbook pass to me, would need another queen or so to bid 1nt with this shape. 1 is not bad bad either I suppose but I just don't like it.
4. 2, I've been down in game before.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-November-16, 22:01

1. Isn't this one of those positions where we're supposed to play the A at trick one to keep declarer in the dark about the honor locations? Maybe the Ten in dummy (and the spots we see) makes this useless. Could partner have led the six from 9864? If so, couldn't declarer, with Q75, have the option of trying to block the suit by ducking if he guesses we have K96/AJ8432. What about 986? Or, has the six marked partner with 654 and declarer with Q987? Anyway, I've probably won the first trick with the Ace and realized too late that I've only managed to confuse partner. Wanting declarer to have to work for his heart trick and not wanting to break clubs or diamonds, I switch to a spade.

2. 4. If we have a slam, partner needs controls in every side suit and with that he may be able to infer we have good hearts -- we have to have something.

3. Pass. Seems just a tad light for 1NT to me.

4. I'm tempted to bid 1N..2N invitational, but that's probably something of a position and I'd end up GFing with 2.
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-November-16, 22:36

TimG, on Nov 16 2008, 08:01 PM, said:

1. Isn't this one of those positions where we're supposed to play the A at trick one to keep declarer in the dark about the honor locations? Maybe the Ten in dummy (and the spots we see) makes this useless. Could partner have led the six from 9864?

I would expect the lead of the 4 from 9864.

Quote

If so, couldn't declarer, with Q75, have the option of trying to block the suit by ducking if he guesses we have K96/AJ8432.  What about 986?


I would expect the 9 from 986.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   maggieb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 339
  • Joined: 2008-October-15
  • Interests:Sewing, Cooking, and Square Dancing!

Posted 2008-November-17, 03:44

1) spade
2) 4, slam rates to be on a losing finesse if partner can't bid again.
3) 1NT of course.
4) 2 of course.
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. :)
0

#6 User is offline   andrei 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 333
  • Joined: 2008-March-31

Posted 2008-November-17, 10:29

1) small
2) 4
3) 1
4) 3
Don't argue with a fool. He has a rested brain
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
0

#7 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,665
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-November-17, 10:45

1. spade 7. Passive seems best at mps

2. 4: whatever 4 is, and I assume it is a good suit, I think I need at least one second round control outside of trumps in order for me to move.. important to do this in tempo, lest partner feel constrained by our hestitation (or the opps feel aggrieved)

3. 1N: pass is probably the correct book call... but the vulnerability is right.. down 1 is probably a good board. Would pass if red and would pass at imps... if LHO doubles 1N, I am going to wish I had passed

4. 2. An overbid, justified by the spade J. The alternative, 3, should deliver a better suit and less outside. Very close, and I may be letting my imp bias overly influence me.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#8 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,670
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-November-17, 11:19

1. 4; I am not convinced that a spade is really that passive, as it could easily help declarer pick up the spade position.

2. 4; the trumps are nice but QJT9 is waste paper on this auction.

3. 1; I like four-card major overcalls at NV.

4. 1NT; I have seen the garbage people open these days and this hand is not a GF. Bidding 3 should deliver a better suit than this, and might miss a 6-2 spade fit. I plan to rebid 2NT over two of a red suit or raise a 2 rebid.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#9 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-November-17, 11:37

My only strong opinions.

3. PASS
4. ANYTHING BUT 3. And I strongly prefer 1NT to 2, it's really an empty looking hand.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-November-17, 12:07

1 is tough, probably a club.

2 I'd bid 4H.

3 I'd pass.

4 I'd bid 1NT, obviously.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-November-17, 16:20

Thanks.

1. The winning return was a club (pard had 654 of hearts so good job staying off that suit, but declarer was AQx Q987, J87xx, Q). I led a spade back; declarer won in hand and advanced the J; pard covered from K9x (ruh-roh), but declarer ducked (!?).

2. 5 is dangerously high (although thats what I bid). 4 looks more prudent. Pard had Ax QJxxx x AQJxx (I was expecting a diamond suit; he was splintering along the way to 4.

3. I passed. Dummy had QTxxxx and an outside Q (Declarer Axx). If you balance, you defend a heart partial I think.

4. I bid the vile 3. It probably doesn't matter what you do - Dayou had a aceless 5=0=4=4 but KQJx of clubs and we got to 5. I'm not convinced about 1N - what are my various rebids - am I now bidding 3? 2 I can buy. I didn't like 3 but its a good depiction of my strength although my suit sucks.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#12 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-November-17, 16:43

Alright, now that the answers are posted it is time to answer ?!?

1) I would play a club, believing that declarer is 3433 with Q987 hearts. Hoping for Q9 with partner, but no strong feelings about this.

2) 4

3) Pass

4) 2, really dislike 3.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users