Page 1 of 1
NT lead #1
#1
Posted 2008-November-26, 06:09
After your RHO opened 1♣ as dealer, and you overcalled 1♥ LHO doubled and bid later 2♦. The contract is now 3NT and you are on the lead.
#2
Posted 2008-November-26, 06:16
just out of interest, are we allowed to know what the double meant, and what the 2D bid meant?
#3
Posted 2008-November-26, 09:16
Sure, nothing was alerted, so standard bids were presumed. The doubler turned out to have 4 spades and 6 diamonds.
#4
Posted 2008-November-26, 09:39
Weird, I thought opener was supposed to pass 2♦.
I voted ♥J but if we play Rosenkrantz I will try ♠A.
I voted ♥J but if we play Rosenkrantz I will try ♠A.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#5
Posted 2008-November-26, 09:50
ochinko, on Nov 26 2008, 03:16 PM, said:
Sure, nothing was alerted, so standard bids were presumed. The doubler turned out to have 4 spades and 6 diamonds.
The auction doesn't make sense playing "standard" as responder showed a weak hand with longer diamonds than spades and opener was not expected to bid again.
If we're supposed to assume the auction does make sense, then opener must have a good diamond fit and is expected to run 6 diamond tricks. In which case I also like the SA lead.
#6
Posted 2008-November-26, 10:41
I lead my 4th best heart.
In all likelihood, I will have a second chance to beat the contract with a spade shift or a club shift if that is necessary. The only time that I will not get a second chance is if the opps can run 9 red tricks, and I find that the combined chances of the opponents being able to run 9 red tricks and our side being able to run 5 black tricks to be highly unlikely.
In all likelihood, I will have a second chance to beat the contract with a spade shift or a club shift if that is necessary. The only time that I will not get a second chance is if the opps can run 9 red tricks, and I find that the combined chances of the opponents being able to run 9 red tricks and our side being able to run 5 black tricks to be highly unlikely.
#7
Posted 2008-November-26, 12:09
Fwiw, I didn't put much thought into the logic of opps' bidding. Being MP the doubler could have expected that his partner won't pass 2♦ even though it shouldn't be forcing.
I am no less interested in your comments than some raw numbers so please continue to submit them.
I am no less interested in your comments than some raw numbers so please continue to submit them.
Page 1 of 1

Help

(1♣) - 1♥ - (Dbl) - Pass
(1NT) - Pass - (2♦ )- Pass
(2NT) - Pass - (3NT) - AP