so this should be
#1
Posted 2010-May-10, 17:47
2D* showed an unspecified major
would you say it's different if 2♦ is just diamonds?
edit after seeing jdonn's post. Basic situation: your partner and you, who play Texas without interference, are trying to decide upon your system.
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2010-May-10, 17:49
I play they remain on through interference 3♣ or lower. That includes 2♦.
#3
Posted 2010-May-10, 17:51
#4
Posted 2010-May-10, 18:01
#5
Posted 2010-May-10, 18:08
#6
Posted 2010-May-14, 12:14
#7
Posted 2010-May-14, 22:59
Jlall, on May 10 2010, 06:08 PM, said:
Maybe not Gerber but 5-5 in majors, accomplishing the xfer effect at the same time? SA Texas didn't occur to me, but any use of 4C after the 2D bid seems to give the opps more tools.
#8
Posted 2010-May-14, 23:38
aguahombre, on May 15 2010, 05:59 AM, said:
Jlall, on May 10 2010, 06:08 PM, said:
Maybe not Gerber but 5-5 in majors, accomplishing the xfer effect at the same time? SA Texas didn't occur to me, but any use of 4C after the 2D bid seems to give the opps more tools.
It seems to me that if 2♦ shows a major suit, 4♣ could usefully be defined as a Roman jump.
gszeszycki, you meant to say that when both transfers are available and they are both jumps, right?
#9
Posted 2010-May-15, 02:03
#10
Posted 2010-May-16, 16:16
If you're looking for ways to fatten your system file, you might consider
4♣ = clubs + a major
4♦ = one major
4M = that major + diamonds
which is also what I recommend over a Multi 2♦ opening.
#11
Posted 2010-May-19, 06:15

Help
