BBO Discussion Forums: move this collection - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

move this collection

#21 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-June-24, 03:03

Codo, on Jun 24 2010, 07:46 AM, said:

All who knows the french style knows this....

Though we may not admire it.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#22 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-June-24, 03:31

I'm pretty sure that Schollaardt-Wortel would bid 2S with opener's hand in a 2/1 GF context. I don't know about the pairs that play for the Dutch team.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#23 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-June-24, 10:45

The_Hog, on Jun 24 2010, 02:20 AM, said:

jdonn, on Jun 24 2010, 05:46 AM, said:

Fluffy, on Jun 23 2010, 04:15 PM, said:

I am asking him right now, and he says 3 should be a better hand, not a balanced ultra minimum. I didn't know this yet.

I don't think any of us know this. :blink:

Pszkola and Kwiecken, (spelling?), played that 3H showed 4 card support not 3. They would certainly rebid 2S with this hand in their system, Strefa. They were not a bad pair, just one of the best in the world....

So "a particular good pair playing a different system only raises with 4 card support" is a counter-example to "I don't think any of us knew opener needs more than a bare minimum to raise"? Interesting.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#24 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-June-24, 17:35

jdonn, on Jun 24 2010, 11:45 PM, said:

The_Hog, on Jun 24 2010, 02:20 AM, said:

jdonn, on Jun 24 2010, 05:46 AM, said:

Fluffy, on Jun 23 2010, 04:15 PM, said:

I am asking him right now, and he says 3 should be a better hand, not a balanced ultra minimum. I didn't know this yet.

I don't think any of us know this. :)

Pszkola and Kwiecken, (spelling?), played that 3H showed 4 card support not 3. They would certainly rebid 2S with this hand in their system, Strefa. They were not a bad pair, just one of the best in the world....

So "a particular good pair playing a different system only raises with 4 card support" is a counter-example to "I don't think any of us knew opener needs more than a bare minimum to raise"? Interesting.

Well, you learned something again Josh. Stay on these forums for a while and wh knows what will happen to you.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users