Page 1 of 1
one more
#1
Posted 2010-September-24, 05:01
♠JTxx ♥KJxx ♦AJxx ♣x
w/w mp. partner deals
p-1♣-x-1♠
x-2♣-p-p
2♥-p-p-3♣
p-p-
I think I would have bid 2♠ over 2♣, but this was partner's problem.
w/w mp. partner deals
p-1♣-x-1♠
x-2♣-p-p
2♥-p-p-3♣
p-p-
I think I would have bid 2♠ over 2♣, but this was partner's problem.
#2
Posted 2010-September-24, 05:03
3♥ seems just about fair. Hope they don't bid 3NT now, which may well make ahah.
#3
Posted 2010-September-24, 05:42
1 ♠ is more often a correct call and no bluff, so I would expect bad breaks all around and pass.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2010-September-25, 09:07
This was a hesitation UI hand. I broke tempo before passing 3♣ and partner bid 3♥. I thought his decision was close and that the hesitation clearly suggested bidding, but he thought it was clear to bid. The director let 3♥ stand. I was surprised but obviously didn't complain.
#5
Posted 2010-September-25, 10:52
Pard - opp1 - You - opp2
p - 1C - X - 1S ( this could be the common psyche )
X ( should show 4 cards Sp )
Continuing:
X - 2C - X* ( it was T/O the first time, and it is still for T/O )
Continuing:
X - 2C - X* - 3C
?? ( now it is partner's problem )
Edit--Or maybe the continuation is:
X - 2C - X* - p
2H - p - p - 3C
p - p - p
p - 1C - X - 1S ( this could be the common psyche )
X ( should show 4 cards Sp )
Continuing:
X - 2C - X* ( it was T/O the first time, and it is still for T/O )
Continuing:
X - 2C - X* - 3C
?? ( now it is partner's problem )
Edit--Or maybe the continuation is:
X - 2C - X* - p
2H - p - p - 3C
p - p - p
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
#6
Posted 2010-September-25, 11:44
karlson, on Sep 25 2010, 08:37 PM, said:
This was a hesitation UI hand. I broke tempo before passing 3♣ and partner bid 3♥. I thought his decision was close and that the hesitation clearly suggested bidding, but he thought it was clear to bid. The director let 3♥ stand. I was surprised but obviously didn't complain.
I think i will bid but pass is clearly a logical alternative imo
All your ace are belong to us!
#7
Posted 2010-September-25, 12:39
3H would certainly be bid by a majority in a poll, but I think it would have to be 90+ percent, and not many of those even considering pass in order to allow 3H. Perhaps in different jurisdictions there are different standards for LA, and my numbers probably aren't right for anywhere, but sticking with it.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#8
Posted 2010-September-26, 01:19
I would pass. We have no undisclosed values or shape after the initial double, our opponents are already pushed to the 3 level, and they are in a minor.
Chris Gibson
#9
Posted 2010-September-27, 01:08
Pass is definitely a LA.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#10
Posted 2010-September-27, 02:24
CSGibson, on Sep 26 2010, 02:19 AM, said:
We have no undisclosed values or shape
because a takeout double guarantees 4441?
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
Page 1 of 1

Help
