Page 1 of 1
4NT?
#2
Posted 2010-October-29, 16:24
#3
Posted 2010-October-29, 16:27
cloa513, on 2010-October-29, 16:24, said:
Given GIB passed the first round, gotta to pass 4NT no matter what its supposed to mean.
LOL
Also, the human is just as responsible. WTF was 5♦?! And 6♥?!
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#4
Posted 2010-October-29, 17:45
cloa513, on 2010-October-29, 16:24, said:
Given GIB passed the first round, gotta to pass 4NT no matter what its supposed to mean.
And thank GIB for not bidding 7NT instead.
What kind of tournament is this? Two humans playing against a human/robot pair?
#7
Posted 2010-October-29, 20:19
cloa513, on 2010-October-29, 20:16, said:
Simple ace and king count.
That may be the case, but GIB plays RKC here as far as I know. GIB was thinking partner has 4 Keycards and there were two ♥Ks I assume.
Still, leaping to 4N is atrocious... Passing is also very bad. There may be a 6-5 type that partner decided not to open, and now playing in 4N certainly does not seem like a good option.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#9
Posted 2010-October-29, 22:49
Sorry, I didn't intend to start an "attribute the blame" thread; I was just hoping to point out an atrocious bid (4NT) by GIB in the hopes of (i) finding out what logic led him to make that bid, (ii) letting other players know about this odd logic, and (iii) requesting a programming modification to eliminate this logic.
Page 1 of 1

Help
