BBO Discussion Forums: Responding to TO double with 3 card suit - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Responding to TO double with 3 card suit

#1 User is offline   fuburules3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 2010-April-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 2011-December-17, 06:36

http://tinyurl.com/768q3z4

Bidding 2D seems strange. Also, the amount the X in this sequence shows seems a bit high given that 2C is a drop (I think it said 14+ when I made the bid).
0

#2 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2011-December-17, 07:49

View Postfuburules3, on 2011-December-17, 06:36, said:

http://tinyurl.com/768q3z4

Bidding 2D seems strange. Also, the amount the X in this sequence shows seems a bit high given that 2C is a drop (I think it said 14+ when I made the bid).

The question whether GIB picked to respond with 3 card but rather whether it had a better bid- clearly hearts.
0

#3 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,884
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-December-19, 09:27

I tried to reproduce this and couldn't. The book bid is 2, and it also bid that in all the simulations I tried.

However, you're correct about the description of X: Takeout double -- 5- C; 4+ D; 4+ H; 5- S; 14-20 total points
That does seem a little high.

#4 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2011-December-19, 12:09

Looks like another one of those situations where GIB doesn't consider the fact that South passed over 1 when determining what x would show over 2.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users