There is a bridge magazine in England called Mr Bridge, and the best part of the magazine is the readers' letters. Once in a while people come out of the woodwork with their suggestions for scoring changes. It is pretty clear that these scoring changes address the weakest part of the suggester's game.
Does anybody else feel that this is backwards? Just seems silly to me...
#21
Posted 2012-September-19, 16:14
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#23
Posted 2012-September-24, 01:19
This should not be a great concern to BBF people. There are no penalty doubles.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#24
Posted 2012-September-24, 01:45
Yes this callous youth, they will never understand why expert standard from the 60's is superior to expert standard from 2012. *sigh*
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin