BBO Discussion Forums: new minor forcing continuation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

new minor forcing continuation

#1 User is offline   shnk 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 2013-May-21

Posted 2013-August-17, 20:29



2 is new minor forcing.
2 shows 3 hearts and a minimum (11-12 hcp)
Does the above look ok?
How to proceed from here?
More generally, what should responder's bidding structure look like from here?
0

#2 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2013-August-17, 21:46

Most the time, responder will now be placing the contract.

The exceptions are 3D -- if you need it to show a 4-6 type of hand of a different strength than 1c-1h-1n-3d does -- and the suit bids between 3H and 4H which can be slam tries in hearts.

The details depend whether you put all your invitations through 2D, or all your game forces.
0

#3 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2013-August-18, 02:21

It sure looks like a forcing 2S is next.... but it's possible you could just "blast" .

Surely, slam is on the horizon.... and partner must have the minors covered for his opening count.
I bet 6NT is the safest .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users