BBF Challenge Event #2
#41
Posted 2016-August-21, 19:39
#42
Posted 2016-August-22, 00:41
gordontd vs olegru
dadim vs nige1
ovncylmz vs Vampyr
nullve vs frank0
eagles123 vs Wackojack
diana_eva vs broze
shyams vs Phil
hrothgar vs barmar
smerriman vs jeffford76
phoenix214 vs nekthen
manudude03 vs zebutin
Each pair to play two 16-board IMP non-best-hand challenges.
The 11 winners, plus 5 smallest losers, will play in round 2.
#43
Posted 2016-August-22, 02:29
smerriman, on 2016-August-22, 00:41, said:
gordontd vs olegru
dadim vs nige1
ovncylmz vs Vampyr
nullve vs frank0
eagles123 vs Wackojack
diana_eva vs broze
shyams vs Phil
hrothgar vs barmar
smerriman vs jeffford76
phoenix214 vs nekthen
manudude03 vs zebutin
Each pair to play two 16-board IMP non-best-hand challenges.
The 11 winners, plus 5 smallest losers, will play in round 2.
How do we do this?
#44
Posted 2016-August-22, 02:31
#45
Posted 2016-August-22, 04:06
smerriman, on 2016-August-22, 00:41, said:
gordontd vs olegru
dadim vs nige1
ovncylmz vs Vampyr
nullve vs frank0
eagles123 vs Wackojack
diana_eva vs broze
shyams vs Phil
hrothgar vs barmar
smerriman vs jeffford76
phoenix214 vs nekthen
manudude03 vs zebutin
Each pair to play two 16-board IMP non-best-hand challenges.
The 11 winners, plus 5 smallest losers, will play in round 2.
Thanks for setting this up.
I find it highly amusing that I got paired against Barry (we used to play at the same bridge club and have been team mates in the past)
#46
Posted 2016-August-22, 06:36
smerriman, on 2016-August-22, 02:31, said:
On my iPad app it is not obvious how to do this.
EDIT no maybe I can do it.
I assume that in the early rounds we are not playing the same set of hands? But anyway could a kibitzer watch the first player and give information to the second player?
#47
Posted 2016-August-22, 09:34
Vampyr, on 2016-August-22, 06:36, said:
That's correct, each challenge gets its own set of hands. So this will be true in all rounds.
As for cheating by kibitzing, the same thing can happen in regular tournaments, main bridge club, etc. No one has ever claimed that cheating is hard on BBO.
#48
Posted 2016-August-22, 11:25
#49
Posted 2016-August-22, 11:55
By the way, how many days does it take a challenge (not accepted or accepted) to expire?
#50
Posted 2016-August-22, 12:55
Vampyr, on 2016-August-22, 06:36, said:
EDIT no maybe I can do it.
I assume that in the early rounds we are not playing the same set of hands? But anyway could a kibitzer watch the first player and give information to the second player?
I accepted your invitation and you are good to go for first 16boards. Good luck!
#51
Posted 2016-August-22, 13:25
barmar, on 2016-August-22, 09:34, said:
As for cheating by kibitzing, the same thing can happen in regular tournaments, main bridge club, etc. No one has ever claimed that cheating is hard on BBO.
I think that cheating in a challenge match *is* pretty hard.
First off, there is no menu that allows you to access current challenge matches being played (with a view to selecting one to kibitz). I stand to be corrected if wrong.
I am not sure whether you could kibitz a specific player who you happened to know was currently playing a challenge match. Should be possible (and I think sensible) for the server to block kibitzers of challenge matches, if not currently blocked.
But if you wanted to kibitz another player in a challenge match you would need to be able accurately to predict when, within a 3 day window, he is likely to be playing the hands.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mstr-mnding) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#52
Posted 2016-August-22, 13:50
1eyedjack, on 2016-August-22, 13:25, said:
First off, there is no menu that allows you to access current challenge matches being played (with a view to selecting one to kibitz). I stand to be corrected if wrong.
I am not sure whether you could kibitz a specific player who you happened to know was currently playing a challenge match. Should be possible (and I think sensible) for the server to block kibitzers of challenge matches, if not currently blocked.
But if you wanted to kibitz another player in a challenge match you would need to be able accurately to predict when, within a 3 day window, he is likely to be playing the hands.
You cannot kibitz challenge matches. Also you cannot see challenge hand records of other players. So only way to cheat is to get help from another source about card play or defense - which doesn't matter to me.
#53
Posted 2016-August-22, 19:25
#54
Posted 2016-August-23, 07:07
1st half: http://webutil.bridg...aeb4-1471886976
2nd half: http://webutil.bridg...aeb4-1471941630
Memorable boards for me (and not because I did well on them!):
* 7, 1st half (I have to remember that this isn't a GiB (or conservative 2/1) 1♠ opener.)
* 14, 1st half (2♠ really felt like an underbid, but I did have "2+ ♠; 10- total points" and I wasn't sure if GiB would understand 2N followed by 3♠.)
* 15, 1st half (Amusing how GiB's defence depended on whether declarer won with the A or K at trick one. I'm not defending anything I did on the board, though.)
* 11, 2nd half (Resisted the temptation to open 2N(!!). It was also tempting to play for an overtrick (by risking a 6-1 diamond break), knowing that I was down 17 after 1 half. At least I had to think about it. )
* 15, 2nd half (I thought for ages about what to do at trick 4, but somehow it didn't occur to me that p could have ♥KT left.)
* 16, 2nd half (My line was probably too speculative, but playing low from dummy at trick 1 felt like giving up. (How often does GiB lead from a bare king like that?) Amazing 3N at the other table!)
This post has been edited by nullve: 2016-August-23, 10:34
#55
Posted 2016-August-23, 08:07
ovncylmz, on 2016-August-22, 13:50, said:
I guess I sometimes forget what types of tables block kibitzers. Since I'm a yellow the normal blocks don't apply to me.
#56
Posted 2016-August-23, 10:50
nullve, on 2016-August-23, 07:07, said:
1st half: http://webutil.bridg...aeb4-1471886976
2nd half: http://webutil.bridg...aeb4-1471941630
Memorable boards for me (and not because I did well on them!):
* 7, 1st half (I have to remember that this isn't a GiB (or conservative 2/1) 1♠ opener.)
* 14, 1st half (2♠ really felt like an underbid, but I did have "2+ ♠; 10- total points" and I wasn't sure if GiB would understand 2N followed by 3♠.)
* 15, 1st half (Amusing how GiB's defence depended on whether declarer won with the A or K at trick one. I'm not defending anything I did on the board, though.)
* 11, 2nd half (Resisted the temptation to open 2N(!!). It was also tempting to play for an overtrick (by risking a 6-1 diamond break), knowing that I was down 17 after 1 half. At least I had to think about it. )
* 15, 2nd half (I thought for ages about what to do at trick 4, but somehow it didn't occur to me that p could have ♥KT left.)
* 16, 2nd half (My line was probably too speculative, but playing low from dummy at trick 1 felt like giving up. (How often does GiB lead from a bare king like that?) Amazing 3N at the other table!)
He says all except the overall result .
-------------1st-----------2nd------------Total
Nullve___7________39_________46 (win 10)
Frank0__24_______12_________36
I guess now I have to pray for big swing in other matches.
#57
Posted 2016-August-23, 14:47
http://webutil.bridg...763&u=wackojack
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
#58
Posted 2016-August-23, 15:13
You sent the invite yesterday and I accepted. I finished all. Please finish soon so we can start the second set.
Update: First set is over. Reporting: ovncylmz-vampyr: 47-0.
#59
Posted 2016-August-24, 14:04
#60
Posted 2016-August-24, 15:27
AQJx
AQxx
Jxx
Ax
xxx
Kxxx
AKTxx
x
Hearts split 3-2 but both pointed hooks were off.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.