P (P) 1H
#1
Posted 2025-April-26, 07:45
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#2
Posted 2025-April-26, 07:57
Otherwise, 1!S
#4
Posted 2025-April-26, 08:10
I think 4♦ splinter is a good alternative. We've got an absolute maximum pass that became more valuable on hearing hearts. Partner will play us for almost exactly this hand if we bid 4♦ here. The only real downside is that we might be too high, especially if partner is the sort to open light in third seat.
#6
Posted 2025-April-26, 08:28
Without these methods then a Drury 2♣.
#7
Posted 2025-April-26, 08:38
The only undisclosed element of my hand is the side singleton, that with some partners we show with 2NT.
#8
Posted 2025-April-26, 08:44
paulg, on 2025-April-26, 08:28, said:
Without these methods then a Drury 2♣.
Thank you for sharing this interesting agreement.
If partner opened 1♠ in 3rd seat, does the above structure use 2NT to show 4-card raise with unknown side-suit singleton?
#10
Posted 2025-April-26, 09:40
#11
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:29
hrothgar, on 2025-April-26, 07:57, said:
Otherwise, 1!S
Give partner something like 3=5=3=2 minimum and he’ll pass 1S quite often. I’d be terrified if I bid 1S. Besides which, having bid 1S there is very little chance of describing this hand to partner even if he takes another bid.
#12
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:32
#13
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:34
Meanwhile, I’d have an easy 2C or 2D, drury. Which depends on agreements. With one occasional partner, I play a one way drury in which 2C shows a 3+ limit raise. In my regular partnerships, one uses 2C for a. 4 card raise, good constructive up to limit, and 2D for a 3 card limit. The other uses 2C as 3 card limit and 2D as 4 card limit. I tend to play whatever partner prefers but I think the 2C showing 4 card support and a good constructive raise or better is superior to the other methods
In both regular partnerships, responder is allowed to bid again if opener signs off. No way am I stopping in 2H here.
#14
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:37
I obviously don't know what your follow ups are. Over 2♣ Drury, you'll get a 2♦ response.
I'll post the complete hand next
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#15
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:42
jillybean, on 2025-April-26, 10:37, said:
I obviously don't know what your follow ups are. Over 2♣ Drury, you'll get a 2♦ response.
I'll post the complete hand next
To me it makes a lot of sense to have a game try below 2M, but not nearly as much to separate shades of non-game-going hands after that. With that in mind, does partner still respond 2♦?
#17
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:44
DavidKok, on 2025-April-26, 10:42, said:
To me it makes a lot of sense to have a game try below 2M, but not nearly as much to separate shades of non-game-going hands after that. With that in mind, does partner still respond 2♦?
2♦ is encouraging, I thought that was standard, silly me.

“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#18
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:51
bluenikki, on 2025-April-26, 10:44, said:
Can you open Axx QJxx Axx for the lead? And 2♥ with x KQJxx Axxx xxx?
This gets more complicated. I'd open 3rd seat 1m (1nt if NV) , I assume you've have xxx in other minor
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#19
Posted 2025-April-26, 10:56
#20
Posted 2025-April-26, 11:41
Bid your splinter, 4♦.
(This assumes that your opening is sound and guarantees not less than 12 total points. My style is 13 points minimum at 1st or 2nd seat, 12 points minimum at 3rd or 4th seat, therefore we don't use Drury or similar and we still use Jacoby and splinter.)