Your call
#3
Posted 2010-May-11, 00:39
A double that forces to the 3 level needs more from me than xxxx in hearts and xx in partner's suit and 6 hcp.
He's still there, although I admit that I won't like it in the unlikely event that it goes P x P...unlikely since he won't double with 3+spades and LHO may well bump the auction if partner is short in spades...I won't mind bidding 4♥ if partner doubles 3♠.
#4
Posted 2010-May-11, 01:24
I think it is generally worth considering whether you wish to compete to the three-level opposite a weak 1NT.
Paul
#6
Posted 2010-May-11, 04:41
cardsharp, on May 11 2010, 07:24 AM, said:
Pass may still be the correct action, but isn't it closer than what all replies so far suggest?
#7
Posted 2010-May-11, 05:10
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2010-May-11, 05:15
If he has enough for game maybe he will reopen with 2NT after which we bid game. Or maybe we play Lebensohl or some such if he reopens with a double.
If he reopens with 3♣ we will have to pass I guess, and sometimes miss game.
#9
Posted 2010-May-11, 05:29
#10
Posted 2010-May-11, 06:11
mcphee, on May 11 2010, 01:29 PM, said:
What do you mean?
We use 'Rubensohl' after 1m-(2M)-??: 2NT=transfer Cl (at least invite); 3Cl=transfer D, ...
But you probably mean?:
1m-(2M)-DBL-(Pass)-??: Opener goes via 2NT with a weak NT?
In the example hand I pass. More difficult if you add ♥Q, then I probably DBL but close at IMPs (2♠ bidder can be pretty strong with a passed partner?)
#11
Posted 2010-May-11, 06:13
Might bid with the same hand but 1435, though.
#12
Posted 2010-May-11, 06:19
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2010-May-11, 07:05
kgr, on May 11 2010, 12:11 PM, said:
mcphee, on May 11 2010, 01:29 PM, said:
What do you mean?
We use 'Rubensohl' after 1m-(2M)-??: 2NT=transfer Cl (at least invite); 3Cl=transfer D, ...
But you probably mean?:
1m-(2M)-DBL-(Pass)-??: Opener goes via 2NT with a weak NT?
In the example hand I pass. More difficult if you add ♥Q, then I probably DBL but close at IMPs (2♠ bidder can be pretty strong with a passed partner?)
he said "if partner reopens"
1x-2♠-p -p
X -p -2NT
#14
Posted 2010-May-11, 07:09
If this were a poll, it might be unanimous.
Oh. It is a poll. And it is not unanimous. Amazing.
Pass.
#15
Posted 2010-May-11, 07:18
Jlall, on May 11 2010, 04:36 AM, said:
quick slip him the ♥Q instead of an x and see if it still is the "easiest pass ever"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#16
Posted 2010-May-11, 08:10
shyams, on May 11 2010, 05:41 AM, said:
Quote
no
#17
Posted 2010-May-11, 08:45
ArtK78, on May 11 2010, 09:09 AM, said:
Oh. It is a poll. And it is not unanimous. Amazing.
It's BBO forums. Would you expect anything else?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#18
Posted 2010-May-11, 09:38
I think a Leben or Ruben agreement here is trying to thread a needle with too small hole. Agree, or not?
Should 2NT here suggest this shape (a neg double hand without the strength)?
Or should 2NT be something like 3-5+ in the minors?
Is this a follow-up or a hijack?

Help

P-P-1♦-2♠-
?