Page 1 of 1
New 3 NT opener? Does anybody use a system like this?
#1
Posted 2010-September-27, 06:10
Hello everyone.
I don't know if anyone else uses this bid but I use 3NT opener with my regular partner to ask for specific Aces.
Around 4 or 5 times a year I have a hand like
AKQJxxxx ♠
- ♥
AK ♦
xx ♣
or something similar with a void in 1 suit.
Asking for Aces doesn't really work, what do I do if partner has the wrong Ace?
also I may not even be able to get to it even if the defenders lead the wrong suit for them to set me right away.
Any hand that is almost safe at the 5 level that can envision a small or grand slam opposite a single Ace would probably open 3NT, almost always it would be with a void.
Here is how it works, after a 3NT opener, partner bids the suit of his Ace if he has one, he bids 4NT without an Ace, if there is interference by the second hand player, a double by partner promises the Ace of that suit, a bid by him promises the Ace of the suit and denies the Ace in the ops suit. A pass by him denies an Ace.
If the bidding goes 3NT - 4NT - any bid by opener is to play.
If it goes something like 3NT - P - 4 ♦ - P, then 4 NT asks what other Ace in the higher suits or King partner has in the lower suits.
Please comment on the system and any helpful suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Theo
I don't know if anyone else uses this bid but I use 3NT opener with my regular partner to ask for specific Aces.
Around 4 or 5 times a year I have a hand like
AKQJxxxx ♠
- ♥
AK ♦
xx ♣
or something similar with a void in 1 suit.
Asking for Aces doesn't really work, what do I do if partner has the wrong Ace?
also I may not even be able to get to it even if the defenders lead the wrong suit for them to set me right away.
Any hand that is almost safe at the 5 level that can envision a small or grand slam opposite a single Ace would probably open 3NT, almost always it would be with a void.
Here is how it works, after a 3NT opener, partner bids the suit of his Ace if he has one, he bids 4NT without an Ace, if there is interference by the second hand player, a double by partner promises the Ace of that suit, a bid by him promises the Ace of the suit and denies the Ace in the ops suit. A pass by him denies an Ace.
If the bidding goes 3NT - 4NT - any bid by opener is to play.
If it goes something like 3NT - P - 4 ♦ - P, then 4 NT asks what other Ace in the higher suits or King partner has in the lower suits.
Please comment on the system and any helpful suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Theo
#2
Posted 2010-September-27, 06:18
4 of 5 times a year? You must play a lot of bridge (or have a faulty calendar)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-September-27, 06:22
Congratulations on your good fortune, I recommend you pick up rubber bridge.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#4
Posted 2010-September-27, 06:28
Yes in my counting I have had hands like this 15 times in the past 4 years in normal bridge.
Also, I have not had a Gambling type 3NT in the past 5 years. I find the convention pretty useless anyways.
Obviously if you play a lot of goulash tournaments these types of hands would come up more often.
Any suggestions for use in the convention, would it be allowed in ACBL tournaments?
Thanks,
Theo
Also, I have not had a Gambling type 3NT in the past 5 years. I find the convention pretty useless anyways.
Obviously if you play a lot of goulash tournaments these types of hands would come up more often.
Any suggestions for use in the convention, would it be allowed in ACBL tournaments?
Thanks,
Theo
#5
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:01
If you are going to use this gadget then i would suggest you modify your responses to
4C = no ace
4D/H/S = that ace
4N = club ace
5C = any 2 aces
Of course you could also go with the more common 4NT specific ace ask and use 3NT for something more useful. A couple of alternative options for 3NT are a Namyats-type hand in either major, or a 'good' preempt to 4 of a minor.
Note also that your example hand is not a classical specific ace asking hand as you cannot find out about the club king easily. You might be better off with an auction like 2C - 2D - 3S and seeing if your partner can cough up a club cue bid.
4C = no ace
4D/H/S = that ace
4N = club ace
5C = any 2 aces
Of course you could also go with the more common 4NT specific ace ask and use 3NT for something more useful. A couple of alternative options for 3NT are a Namyats-type hand in either major, or a 'good' preempt to 4 of a minor.
Note also that your example hand is not a classical specific ace asking hand as you cannot find out about the club king easily. You might be better off with an auction like 2C - 2D - 3S and seeing if your partner can cough up a club cue bid.
(-: Zel :-)
#6
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:36
Thanks for the suggestion.
I use the 2 ♣ - 2 ♦ - 3 of a major to show a 2 ♣ opener with exactly 4 of the major and 6 or more ♦. This was shown to me by a Canadian teacher which was developed by Kokish he told me.
I will look into the Ace answering suggestion that you said.
Thanks a lot,
Theo
I use the 2 ♣ - 2 ♦ - 3 of a major to show a 2 ♣ opener with exactly 4 of the major and 6 or more ♦. This was shown to me by a Canadian teacher which was developed by Kokish he told me.
I will look into the Ace answering suggestion that you said.
Thanks a lot,
Theo
#7
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:45
You might want to show 2 specific Aces as well, since you got a lot of big hands. Say you have AKQJTxxxx-void-KQ-KQ then you definitely don't want to hear 2 Aces... So use CRASH to show 2 Aces (step 1 = same color, step 2 = same rank, step 3 = ♠♦/♥♣). Oh, and if you show 1 Ace, also give the possibility to show the other 3. With my example hand responder can show ♠A or the other 3.
What do you use 2♣-2♦-3NT and 2♣-2♦-4NT for? You might want to put it over there, no big issues
I wouldn't go for it, since I never have such hands...
What do you use 2♣-2♦-3NT and 2♣-2♦-4NT for? You might want to put it over there, no big issues
I wouldn't go for it, since I never have such hands...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#8
Posted 2010-September-27, 07:57
I use 2 ♣ - 2 ♦ - 3NT to show a balanced hand 25 - 27 points.
Although it has very rarely come up, 2 ♣ - 2 ♦ - 4NT would show the same with 28 - 29 points and the same sequence with 5 NT, 30 - 31 points I guess.
Theo
Although it has very rarely come up, 2 ♣ - 2 ♦ - 4NT would show the same with 28 - 29 points and the same sequence with 5 NT, 30 - 31 points I guess.
Theo
#9
Posted 2010-September-27, 08:57
TheoKole, on Sep 27 2010, 07:10 AM, said:
Hello everyone. I don't know if anyone else uses this bid but I use 3NT opener with my regular partner to ask for specific Aces. Around 4 or 5 times a year I have a hand like
♠ AKQJxxxx ♥- ♦ AK ♣ xx
or something similar with a void in 1 suit.
Asking for Aces doesn't really work, what do I do if partner has the wrong Ace? Also I may not even be able to get to it even if the defenders lead the wrong suit for them to set me right away.
Any hand that is almost safe at the 5 level that can envision a small or grand slam opposite a single Ace would probably open 3NT, almost always it would be with a void
Here is how it works, after a 3NT opener, partner bids the suit of his Ace if he has one, he bids 4NT without an Ace, if there is interference by the second hand player, a double by partner promises the Ace of that suit, a bid by him promises the Ace of the suit and denies the Ace in the ops suit. A pass by him denies an Ace.
If the bidding goes 3NT - 4NT - any bid by opener is to play.
If it goes something like 3NT - P - 4 ♦ - P, then 4 NT asks what other Ace in the higher suits or King partner has in the lower suits.
Please comment on the system and any helpful suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.
♠ AKQJxxxx ♥- ♦ AK ♣ xx
or something similar with a void in 1 suit.
Asking for Aces doesn't really work, what do I do if partner has the wrong Ace? Also I may not even be able to get to it even if the defenders lead the wrong suit for them to set me right away.
Any hand that is almost safe at the 5 level that can envision a small or grand slam opposite a single Ace would probably open 3NT, almost always it would be with a void
Here is how it works, after a 3NT opener, partner bids the suit of his Ace if he has one, he bids 4NT without an Ace, if there is interference by the second hand player, a double by partner promises the Ace of that suit, a bid by him promises the Ace of the suit and denies the Ace in the ops suit. A pass by him denies an Ace.
If the bidding goes 3NT - 4NT - any bid by opener is to play.
If it goes something like 3NT - P - 4 ♦ - P, then 4 NT asks what other Ace in the higher suits or King partner has in the lower suits.
Please comment on the system and any helpful suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.
- I agree that the traditional 3N = solid minor is daft. When 3N is the right contract, the wrong hand plays it.
- I play 3N = solid major or semi-solid with an outside A.
- I like your 3N bid = ask for specific Aces, too. (Although you can cater for such hands by opening 2♣ then jumping in your suit to set it as trumps and demand cue-bids).
- Keeps the bidding low enough to cater for "wrong" aces but
- Much harder to remember
- 3N - ??
- 4♣ = Zero or two aces. Then 4♦ asks which?
- 4♦ = minor ace. Then 4N asks which?
- 4♥ = ♠A.
- 4♠ = ♥A.
- 4N = Four aces.
- 5♣/5♦/5♥/5♠ = Three aces but not in the bid suit.
3N - 4♣
??- 4♦ = Do you have 2 aces?
- 4♥/4♠/5♦/5♣ Natural non-forcing but asking for top honours by steps.
e.g. rebid 4♠ with ♠ JT98xxxx ♥ - ♦ AKQJ ♣ A
3N - 4♦
4N - ??- 5♣ = ♦A.
- 5♦ = ♣A.
3N - 4♣
4♦ - ??- 4♥ = Sorry zero.
- 4♠ = Two aces. Denies ♠ ace. Then 4N asks "other ace-less suit?"
- 4N = Major aces (in case opener needs minor aces).
- 5♣ = Pointy aces (in case opener needs round suit aces).
- 5♦ = Black aces (in case opener needs red aces).
3N - 4♣
4♦ - 4♠
4N - ??- 5♣ = Denies ♣A. (Hence shows red aces).
- 5♦ = Denies ♦A. (Hence shows round aces).
- 5♥ = Denies ♥A. (Hence shows minor aces).
3N - 4♣
4♠ - ??
??- _P = No ♠ honour.
- 4N (1 step) = Q.
- 5♣ (2 steps) = K.
- 5♦ (4 steps) = A
- 5♥ (5 steps) = KQ.
- 5♠ (6 steps) = AQ.
- 5N] (7 steps) = AK.
- 6♣ (8 steps) = AKQ.
- 4♣ = Zero or two aces. Then 4♦ asks which?
#10
Posted 2010-September-27, 09:02
This convention is legal on the General Convention Chart in the ACBL.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
Page 1 of 1

Help
