Page 1 of 1
After partner doubles 1NT
#2
Posted 2011-July-16, 13:55
What?
If your partner doubles 1NT for penalties you either pass, takeout to your best suit (or invite if you think you can have a game) or get to game. I don't know of any system to deal with it.
If your partner doubles 1NT for penalties you either pass, takeout to your best suit (or invite if you think you can have a game) or get to game. I don't know of any system to deal with it.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2011-July-16, 16:27
It's standard that two of anything is to play, because in general the only hands that would bid here are weak hands. Three of a suit is probably best played as invitational with a long suit and not much else.
I have seen (and even played) a scheme where 2♣ is a signoff somewhere, and other bids show two-suiters. I don't think the loss of a natural 2♣ makes this worthwhile, because the two-suiters are quite rare.
I have seen (and even played) a scheme where 2♣ is a signoff somewhere, and other bids show two-suiters. I don't think the loss of a natural 2♣ makes this worthwhile, because the two-suiters are quite rare.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#4
Posted 2011-July-16, 16:39
gnasher, on 2011-July-16, 16:27, said:
I have seen (and even played) a scheme where 2♣ is a signoff somewhere, and other bids show two-suiters. I don't think the loss of a natural 2♣ makes this worthwhile, because the two-suiters are quite rare.
Bidding 2♣ as a conventional call makes more sense than wanting to play in Justin's (LHO's) eight-card suit.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2011-July-16, 19:04
Surely you would pass this hand if partner doubles.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#7
Posted 2011-July-17, 02:43
Bbradley62, on 2011-July-16, 19:42, said:
Express TCR80 tourney. 7 Easts faced this situation; 2 passed (+500 and -180), 4 bid 2♦ (taken as a ♥ xfer by one West), and 1 bid 2♣ Stayman (and his partner played Moysian 2♥).
Perhaps it's a question of partnership agreement in some of the cases you mention. For me the double would be 2 suited takeout including a 4 card major, and I would bid 2♣ to deny a 4 card major. I know someone who plays X as a general takeout, and then the bid with this hand is of course 2♦.
In general though, if it is a penalty double I can't see why you would bid with this hand. If you wanted to bid with weaker hands then you would want 2♣ as a genuine suit rather than a convention such as stayman. So my answer to your question is "no".
#8
Posted 2011-July-17, 05:26
There's no such thing as 'standard' because that's usually quite regional. That being said, I would never consider systems on in this situation, unless specifically agreed. After a penalty Dbl from partner, either you pass or you bid your own suit when you're really weak.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#9
Posted 2011-July-17, 05:47
Bbradley62, on 2011-July-16, 19:42, said:
Express TCR80 tourney. 7 Easts faced this situation; 2 passed (+500 and -180), 4 bid 2♦ (taken as a ♥ xfer by one West), and 1 bid 2♣ Stayman (and his partner played Moysian 2♥).
I believe the Express TCR tourneys are the free, individual tournaments? If so, playing in these games is a recipe for disaster, there is no standard.
For me it is penalty and I pass. I have no idea how it would be interpreted and what subsequent bids would mean in an indy.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
Page 1 of 1